Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Gsellman versus Jarred Cosart, not Zack Cozart.

No Padre has seen Bobby, whereas Granderson is 0/17 against 'red. If Bruce can go, expect to see Curtis sit.


  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Good day to play José Reyes in center.


TJ Third, Flores short? I guess. I hate that the Mets punt defense this aggressively. Though you have to do Lagares in Center and Reyes in right...

I'd just play Granderson, 0/17 is extremely small sample.


Posted


Might as well get all you can out of Granderson now seeing as how the days of him being a full-time player are numbered, quite possibly in the single digits.


Posted


Ceetar wrote:
Good day to play José Reyes in center.


TJ Third, Flores short? I guess.

Or TJ at short. Or Reynolds at short.

Ceetar wrote:
I hate that the Mets punt defense this aggressively.

Agreed, but Reynolds at short wouldn't be punting, and given a little time, Reyes would probably give you at least as much in center as Granderson.

Ceetar wrote:
Though you have to do Lagares in Center and Reyes in right...

Unless you do Reyes in center and Bruce Magoose in right.

Ceetar wrote:
I'd just play Granderson, 0/17 is extremely small sample.

I don't know. Maybe, but I'm holding it side-by-side with his 24-for-145 this season.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


I actually forgot about Reynolds. oops! Flores has good numbers against Cosart, also in a pretty meaningless sample, so he'll probably be in there somewhere.

Granderson actually has a .910 OPS over the last 14 games.


Posted


Jose Reyes seems like he could be a natural in CF and lord knows he hits better than Lagares.

You could move Lagares out of the organization and replace him with Nimmo.

You might get a couple high A guys for Laggy. Pitchers please.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Ashie62 wrote:
Jose Reyes seems like he could be a natural in CF and lord knows he hits better than Lagares.

You could move Lagares out of the organization and replace him with Nimmo.

You might get a couple high A guys for Laggy. Pitchers please.


Lagares is hitting better than Reyes this year.

Reyes has no range in the infield, and no practice judging fly balls isn't going to give him good range in the outfield.

Lagares adds a ton of value in the outfield.

I'm still not convinced we shouldn't be aiming for a Cespedes-Lagares-Conforto outfield by July.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted



Maggot CF
Solarte 2B
Myers 1B
Schimpf 3B
Renfroe RF
Cordoba LF
Aybar SS
Torrens C
Cosart P


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


[tweet:1jge1haa]

[/tweet:1jge1haa]


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Bruce to the bench still doesn't get Conforto in the three-hole.


Much like last year, Terry loves those homers with no one on base.


Posted


Conforto has a .425 OBP to go with the home runs. Nobody else on the team comes close. I don't know what sabermetricians think of batting order (as far as I know, they don't know either), but it's not a slam dunk to me that we'd get more out of Conforto by putting him in the middle of the order and somebody with a .320 OBP in the leadoff spot.


Posted


Chad Ochoseis wrote:
Conforto has a .425 OBP to go with the home runs. Nobody else on the team comes close. I don't know what sabermetricians think of batting order (as far as I know, they don't know either), but it's not a slam dunk to me that we'd get more out of Conforto by putting him in the middle of the order and somebody with a .320 OBP in the leadoff spot.

This. Leave him there.


Posted


Yeah, I think it's more about not having another great (or even good) option at leadoff than anything else.
Reyes, even with his recent "resurgence" (finally off the interstate!!) is still OBA'ing under .300 and at least Terry isn't just falling back on Jose's 'lead-off-ed-ness' as his sole criteria.
Grandy is at .166/.231 (BA/OBA); Lagares = .220/.304

Would Walker at #1 and Conforto 3rd make a difference as opposed to the other way around? Prolly not.




Chad Ochoseis wrote:
I don't know what sabermetricians think of batting order (as far as I know, they don't know either) ...


They're pretty much of the opinion that, as long as you don't do something really stupid, the specific order doesn't matter a whole lot.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:


Chad Ochoseis wrote:
I don't know what sabermetricians think of batting order (as far as I know, they don't know either) ...


They're pretty much of the opinion that, as long as you don't do something really stupid, the specific order doesn't matter a whole lot.


The idea here is that the extra AB you get from Conforto's .420 OBP is negated by the much lower volume of runners on base by being leadoff.

I don't have the numbers in front of me to say how many more, but it's gotta be good for a few more runs moving him down to second or third. Traded for simply having a few more total AB here and there and the difference between Conforto and Reyes every once in a while.

This is why you put your best hitters second or third. You still want guys one for them.


Posted


I'm sorry but Lagares just isn't that good. He had his career year on defense and can't steal first.

I would take a couple pitchers for Lagares, promote Nimmo and be very satisfield.


Posted


d'Kong76 wrote:

Maggot CF
Solarte 2B
Myers 1B
Schimpf 3B
Renfroe RF
Cordoba LF
Aybar SS
Torrens C
Cosart P



Heh, heh ... Maggot


Do you suppose that this Cordoba guy in LF has a glove made out of rich Corinthian leather?


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...