Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Rubes reporting they've placed him waivers in a move that could save 'em $3 million.I guess there's no SS controversy after all.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 well, just the one where they make the team worse to save 2.5 million apparently.
Guest d'Kong76 Guests Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Kinda ballsey considering the knee thing with Cabrera but I guess they'recomfortable with Reynolds coming north?
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Sort of knew this day would come, but figured he'd go in a trade. St.L must have balked at the $$ themselves.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 At 26 (still!), he's a veteran with a lifetime .330 OBP and credible defense/experience at three infield positions. That's not just a net-positive; that's an h-to-G asset. You can't sell that?
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Beware the Ides of March, Ruben.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:At 26 (still!), he's a veteran with a lifetime .330 OBP and credible defense/experience at three infield positions. That's not just a net-positive; that's an h-to-G asset. You can't sell that?We traded Rey Sanchez! Call up Duquette. Get Jim on the phone. Jim? How did you deal Rey Sanchez.
Lefty Specialist Old-Timey Member Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 A bit surprised; I guess they feel the Asdrubal thing is minor.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Even though there's been talk the last week about this happening I am still in shock. He came to ST in good shape. He's been hitting. Cabrera went down. I figured Mr. T would plug that gap while Flores floats between the corners.I've been hoping to see more of Matt Reynolds for over a year now, so maybe this makes way for that, in which case I'll get over it.They couldn't move him?
G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Chase Utley is a modern-day Ed Ott except with a rule named for him and nobody, as far as we know, becoming a Taiyo Whale as a result.
ashie62 Old-Timey Member Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 St. Louis wouldn't pick up any part of the salary I guess.Management must really really like Matt Reynolds.
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 i think management just wanted to save $2.5m, and didn't think the difference between Tejada and Reynolds was worth that amount of money. I"m sure they're right in that assessment, but Reynolds is entirely unproven so, even though i've never been a Tejada fan, this seems to me a weakening of the bench for financial reasons, particularly in light of the injury to Cabrera and Wright's tentative condition. I'm not going to tear my hair out over it (as i do not have much left), but i do think we're marginally weaker today than we were yesterday, just so they can save a few bucks. which is irritating.
RealityChuck Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Some reports speculate Tejada may go to the Dodgers to form a double play combination with Chase Utley.
G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Officially released, leaving Lucas Duda as second-longest tenured and only Met to arrive on roster during the Manuel administration.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Seems like a strange call. Is $3 million for a second-strong shortstop the best investment of money? Well, it seems a better investment than $5.75 million for a third-string center fielder.I'm guessing part of the thinking is that he lost a step following the leg injury. Else, they might well have just non-tendered him outright, and saved the full salary.
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Nuclear winter for Omar guys -- Muffy, Niese, Mejia and now Tejada.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:Nuclear winter for Omar guys -- Muffy, Niese, Mejia and now Tejada.Also Parnell & Gee (well, in the last year anyway).So that's four Top-100 guys: #20 (Murph), 30 (JN), 78 (DG), 90 (RT), plus Parnell at #123 (acc to CPF Rankings Central) all jettisoned within a very short span.Mejia (#273) -- or the conspiracy surrounding him -- removed himself from the equation.
ashie62 Old-Timey Member Posted March 16, 2016 Posted March 16, 2016 Keith was on Boomer today and suggested Tejada was in the doghouse the last four years, he inferred it was for being out of shape.He also thought 3 million was alot of money for a backup player and the Mets wanted to go with the younger guy. (Reynolds.)http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/25519303/mets-release-chase-utley-takeout-slide-victim-ruben-tejada
Guest d'Kong76 Guests Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 Four years is a long time to be in a doghouse. I dunno, I kindafind it sad how his tenure ended... but the show must go on...
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 Sandy was no fan of his, and Terry was mad when he showed up late to ST in '13, so it'd been awhile.
Guest d'Kong76 Guests Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 I just mean the dude got his leg broke, and then he gets betterand his ties with the team are fractured again. Just being sentimental,and I know he certainly didn't deserve the raise he would have gotten in 2016.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 He was certainly in the doghouse back when he showed up late to Florida (not actually late, but not early either acc to Terry) and supposedly out of shape a couple of years back, but I don't think it necessarily follows that, because of that, he took up permanent residence in the chateau bow-wow ever since. I just think Sandy views him as a mediocre and therefore replaceable player.The broken leg possibly scuttled plans to deal him over the winter, or maybe they like what they've seen out of Reynolds so far this spring and decided it was safe (and cost effective) to cut bait now.
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 I think it's safe to assume the lack of a trade indicated the broader market doesn't feel he's a $3M player.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 What I want to know is if Teufel gets 11 back now.
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 It is kinda weird to see Tuff wearing the same number of his alleged tormentor. All the same I am rooting against the coaches occupying player unis. There has been a No. 11 playing on the Mets every year except for 3 years (1967, 1968 and 2002).
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted March 17, 2016 Posted March 17, 2016 Giving a preferential option to those who played who played for the team getting their old numbers if they return as coaches (if it's not already assigned to a player) is a pretty long-running tradition, though, isn't it?Yogi wore 8. Willie wore 24. Harrelson wore 3. Stearns wore 12. That's a stretch of precedence that gets us from the sixties to the aughts Even less legendary types got low numbers. Bobby Valentine got 2. Mike Cubbage got 4. And they didn't even wear those numbers as Mets players! It's kind of a nice bow to their notability. But players, Mookie will tell you, still get precedence in times of conflict.Bob Geren in 7 was another story. And he didn't even show his appreciation by sticking around.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts