NLCS Prediction

[bmfc1]

Do it.

Edited October 16, 2015 by Guest

[Benjamin Grimm]

I'm more optimistic about beating the Cubs than I was the Dodgers, but I don't expect it to be easy. So I said Mets in 7.

[Guest Rockin' Doc]

Benjamin Grimm wrote: I'm more optimistic about beating the Cubs than I was the Dodgers, but I don't expect it to be easy. So I said Mets in 7.

Me too.

[Zvon]

As a Mets fan one thing I've learned is nothings easy and, the two things I've learned...I'll start again.
The two things I've learned are that nothings easy and when it comes to postseason games involving the Mets, nothings ordinary.

I'd like an ordinary 4 game sweep. But nothing's easy and nothing's ordinary. Mets in 6.

[Elster88]

Why is this locked? Mets in 5. This won't be hard.

[Lefty Specialist]

Mets in 7. It won't be easy. They're going to make the Mets starters work, and our bullpen outside of Familia is suspect.

Need David and Duda to get hot.

[ashie62]

Lefty Specialist wrote: Mets in 7. It won't be easy. They're going to make the Mets starters work, and our bullpen outside of Familia is suspect. Need David and Duda to get hot.

Mets in 6. Duda looks like roadkill of late.

[Edgy MD]

Mets in three.

[Elster88]

I recommend going to tonight's game. There will be no other NLCS games at City Field this year. Your only options for seeing the Mets love after today are in Chicago or in the World Series.

[Elster88]

Hendricks and Hammel the next two games.

Meat

[nymr83]

Elster88 wrote: Hendricks and Hammel the next two games. Meat

Mets need to feast on these scrubs, I dont even want to see Arrieta/Lester again, SWEEP THIS SHIT!

[Elster88]

Elster88 wrote: Why is this locked? Mets in 5. This won't be hard.

Did I give the Cubs too much credit? Homers can be hit with one hand in this silly, creeper-covered park and Matz has hardly broken his cherry so maybe they can steal game 4.

[Gwreck]

The person who voted "Cubs in 6" was wrong

[Edgy MD]

I was really the only voter for "Mets in 4," you faithless animals?

[Gwreck]

I had it in 5.

Bigger question: who wants to admit they had the Cubs?

[Elster88]

I knew this would be an easy series but thought that either Arrietta would steal one or that they might be able to hit Matz (but not both), so I said an easy Mets in five.

[Edgy MD]

That's because you're a faithless animal.

[Elster88]

Which one is faith which is fear I always mix them up

[Zvon]

Edgy MD wrote: I was really the only voter for "Mets in 4," you faithless animals?

I tip my cap in your general direction.