Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted


Excuse my passion today.

If that play, if you can't stand there and catch the ball and tag a guy out they are screwing things up. That perfect baseball play we saw just now is illegal?

Was he supposed to catch it in front of the plate and dive into the guy? That's ridiculous.

K, done venting.


Posted


Part of what's amazing about this winning streak is that they're doing it while going like 1-of-57* in replay reviews even though virtually none of the calls that went against them have had 'clear and convincing' evidence that the call needed reversing (or not).



* may not be exactly accurate


Posted


Was he called safe because of the new rule? Or because his foot touched the plate before the tag? (It does look like that might have been the case.) I'm half-watching with the sound off so I have no idea what the broadcasters might have had to say about the play.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Was he called safe because of the new rule? Or because his foot touched the plate before the tag? (It does look like that might have been the case.) I'm half-watching with the sound off so I have no idea what the broadcasters might have had to say about the play.

I was kinda yelling at the screen so I missed much of what was said. I thought they said that they don't know for sure yet the "why" of it and will give us that info when they get it.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
They eventually learned that it was ruled an illegal block by the Home-Recker.

k, thank you, I missed that. I thought they were just speculating.

One of these days a catcher will do it the way they want, catch and dive into the runner, and break his neck. Wonder what that'll do to this silly rule.


Muffy? Ugh. Well, that's one of those things that Muffys does. Brain fart.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Dumb play by Muffy making things harder.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
They eventually learned that it was ruled an illegal block by the Home-Recker.


Oh well. I think he might have been legitimately safe anyway.

That lineout to left for the first out is good news. Maybe they can get Andrelton to GIDP?


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


I have a bad feeling about this game.


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


Getting picked off second is the kind of thing that gives me bad feelings.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Mets Guy in Michigan wrote:
Getting picked off second is the kind of thing that gives me bad feelings.


Nothing compared to failing to drive in a leadoff triple in the first inning.


Posted


Mets Guy in Michigan wrote:
I have a bad feeling about this game.


That occurred to me for a second too, but then I remembered:

1. Craig Kimbrel's on the Padres now
2. We're not at Turner Field
3. 10 game winning streak = we've got the momentum, suckas*



---
*Scientific accuracy of this statement not yet defined


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Have been catching what I can this week on the radio, so this is my first time seeing Ian Thomas.

He's got a bit of Rocker-cum-Sling Blade to his mug, no?


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


Must take advantage of all these walks!


Old-Timey Member
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Have been catching what I can this week on the radio, so this is my first time seeing Ian Thomas.

He's got a bit of Rocker-cum-Sling Blade to his mug, no?

Duh.Dribble.


UGH. Murph, that was pathetic. Coulda redeemed yourself there.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...