Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


Remember that it's 7:00 tonight (I have no idea why the 6 PM local start time).
We need this one. Losing 2 of 3 in Chicago is a lost opportunity, getting swept would be an embarrassment.

Muffy gets the day off which is probably good ... but not if it results in our worst hitter leading off.
Hell, I'd bat deGrom there before Cy Oung. Plus Terry misses the chance to put the three little d's in the same lineup.

C Young - CF
Granderson - RF
Wright - 3B
Campbell - 1B
Brown - LF
Flores - 2B
Tejada - SS
d'Arnaud - C
deGrom - P



Buddy Carlyle has been DFA'd to make room for the return of Brown - so we've not only got a bigger bench as of now but also 3 LHPs in the pen.


  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Grand Central Contributor
Posted


RealityChuck wrote:
FYI, I'm at the game. Behind the Cubs
dugout in the third section back in the shade.


have a poppy seed bun for me.


we've been batting one of our worst hitters leadoff almost daily all season, why change it now?


Old-Timey Member
Posted


I want deGrom to get a win. Yea, now's a great time to field that line-up. [ /]sarcasm meter

Line-up, please make a fool out of me and score a dozen runs for the kid.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Wow. He may have been safe. Great throw Brown but only if he stays out. Man advances to 2nd on the throw.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Crapcicles. Called safe. I would have wanted to challenge the DP thing but that did look too close to risk.
And Wood takes deGrom yard. YOW!


Posted


Nope says the ruling. Do you think the evidence says he was conclusively safe?

And the homer suddenly makes it a three-run reversal.


Posted


Cubs announcers were surprised that Terry didn't challenge the safe call at first base on the attempted double-play. On replay it did look like it should have been an out call.

If that call had been reversed, the Cubs wouldn't have scored any of their three runs.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Nope says the ruling. Do you think the evidence says he was conclusively safe?

And the homer suddenly makes it a three-run reversal.


I was a little surprised because it looked like he avoided the tag from the views available, but there was no definitive view, imo. In other words, a perspective showing some space between the glove and the guy. I didn't see that so I didn't think they'd reverse it.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Cubs announcers were surprised that Terry didn't challenge the safe call at first base on the attempted double-play. On replay it did look like it should have been an out call.

If that call had been reversed, the Cubs wouldn't have scored any of their three runs.


One replay looked safe, the other out (only saw two).

It would have been a risk. It was a crucial DP tho. One of those possible game changers for a pitcher.

deGrom doubles, lol. I love this kid.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Shit. I missed whatever happened that inning. It does not read well.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
What does that Campbell K make it now, 1 for their last 91 w/RiSP or something like that?


Close.
22-for-116 over their last 10 games (.190)
Five of those hits were garbage time hits in the blowout win at Philly, and because a large chunk of our hits are singles, not all of the hits w/RiSP actually plate a run.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


DOWNTOWN!

Keep the stupid coming, please.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Well, that puts the stupid to my question.

Should we be letting Brown hit here?

Yes.


Easy to say now,hehe. Graphically speaking, I was not prepared for this eventuality. BrownBoom!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...