Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


Sign Cruz, a starter (maybe Scott Feldman if they can't sign Arroyo?), maybe a reliever, find a shortstop, and that's a decent off season. It fills the holes that needed to be filled. Anything more than that would be gravy.

Later


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I'm not all jazzed over this guy, especially now that we've added Young. He's behind Choo, Either, Grandy Man among those I'd look to fill out the outfield at this point.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Better still than naked Pablo Cruise, but really, not a great idea at all.



Posted


Can somebody sum up the anti-Cruz argument?

I was thinking he was a proceed-caution-guy, not a not-a-great-idea-at-all guy.

Is it just about holding off whilst more attractive options remain?


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I dunno. Based on my own biased opinion, I have more concern that his power was field + PED related than some of the other guys. Also, considering we're trying to unload up to all three of Ike, Duda, Muffy, and recently inked Young, perhaps its better for the Mets to be dealing for lefthanded sluggers, to extent they can get them.


Posted


I'm not optimistic anymore on Cruz or anyone big ticket type come as a free agent, Peralta gets something like $53 million from St. Louis for four years? , guy is 31....Cruz surely gets that or more?


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Can somebody sum up the anti-Cruz argument?


-- His non-hitting skills are for shit; Dudaesque in left field, and-- at this point-- Dudaesque on the basepaths.
-- His hitting skills are good, not grrrrreat (wOBAs of .353, .335, .359 in the last three years; career OBP of .327).
-- Home/road splits to rival CarGo (.734 OPS away from Arlington as a Ranger).
-- He's turning 34 this coming season.
-- Like, an old 34. Like, a rickety 34, a 34 that's seen some things. (Often in shady, little-used clubhouse halls... or the backrooms of weight-training facilities... or storefront "medical" offices.)
-- 1.5 fWAR average for each of the last three years.
-- He's played one-- one-- season in his career in which he hasn't missed at least 30 games due to injury.
-- He turned down a $14.1M qualifying offer from the Rangers, so he's looking for at least that much for multiple years. Multiple years that would take him to, say, age 37 or 38.
-- This guy. At 37-38.

I mean, there's some more, but that kinda sums it up.


Posted


Well when you put it like that I suppose it would not be wise to invest the $$ he will be looking for never mind the years.


Posted


The career OPS+ of 114 is below the other available outfielders, most of whom are younger, and that's before you factor PEDs into the equation. The fact that he turned down the qualifying offer already means he's not coming at a discount. I see nothing positive at all unless the asking price plummets.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


smg58 wrote:
The career OPS+ of 114 is below the other available outfielders, most of whom are younger, and that's before you factor PEDs into the equation.


That's also Lucas Duda's career OPS+...and we've already pointed out that Duda's probably not much worse if he is worse in the outfield.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Well, but Cruz is much less passive. I mean, can you see Duda flying down to Miami just for some medicine?


Posted


So, given that we have the cheaper, younger, reputably cleaner, funnier, and more familiar model on hand... .

You just wonder if he's going to be a Met that magic day Lucas wakes up and suddenly realizes... holy crap, this game is easy!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...