MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 Edgy DC wrote:Well, I know one, and he subsequently became a Met.I would have thought it might have been Mays or Roberto Alomar, but each of them was short in one category in their best comparable year.Don't keep us in suspense.Later
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 metirish wrote:Rickey Henderson?Career high in triples was seven. He'd rather stop at second and then steal third.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 It's the infamous ... Juan Samuel
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 Frayed Knot wrote:It's the infamous ... Juan SamuelSorry for the delay in responding. I had to pick myself up off the floor.Later
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 Can we PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE not compare Jose Reyes to Juan Samuel, Ruiner Of Franchises?
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 Hey, he just missed doing it twice more - while only slightly older than Reyes.Now you know what so intrigued Davey about him.Problem is, they should have gone looking at OBAs. You'd think the computer-savvy Davey would have be wiser to that.
Guest Yancy Street Gang Guests Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 Ruiner of franchises?That's a bit extreme.Maybe some day Samuel will manage the Mets to their fourth (or fifth? or sixth?) World Championship. Would that redeem him?
Guest Johnny Dickshot Guests Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 Samuel didn't ruin the Mets. The guys who traded for him did.In his day, he was a lot like young Reyes -- great speed/power combo, low OBP. I'm of the opinion that sliding head first on the hard surface of Vets stadium ruined his wrists and forearms and elbows and made him a less effective hitter gradually, and when he lost his great speed, a lot of his game went away.His stats prior to and post the trade in 89 were probably within a range of one another: He wasn't having a good year before he was traded to the Mets and didn't since.
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 I was just kidding. It's all good.
Guest Yancy Street Gang Guests Posted August 24, 2006 Posted August 24, 2006 I never understood the idea of hating the guys who come to the Mets in bad trades.It's not Juan Samuel's fault the Mets gave up Lenny and Roger for him.Victor Zambrano didn't pull the trigger on the Kazmir deal.Jim Fregosi didn't lobby to be traded to the Mets.I can, however, understand griping when a player comes to the Mets and immediately goes into decline, like Roberto Alomar and George Foster did. But again, it's not like they chose to play badly.On the other hand, I had a friend once who was a Cleveland Indians fan, and he grew to hate Keith Hernandez, and I understand his perspective. Keith signed a contract with the Indians after he left the Mets, but after playing a few games with them pretty much lost interest. He got injured and never even tried to return. While the Indians were paying Keith to not play, he kept turning up in the gossip pages of the New York tabloids in photos taken at social events in New York.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.