Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Yirsandy Rodríguez

Grand Central Contributor
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospects Ranking

New York Mets Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

The New York Mets Players Project

2026 New York Mets Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Yirsandy Rodríguez

  1. Image courtesy of © Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images By mid-May, New York is still trying to figure out what kind of teams the Yankees and Mets actually are. The Yankees continue winning just enough games to remain firmly inside the American League conversation, but they arrive at the Subway Series carrying bullpen concerns and an offense that finished its series against the Baltimore Orioles with 15 consecutive scoreless innings. When Aaron Judge and Ben Rice are not producing, the Yankees’ offense has struggled badly to create runs. The Mets, meanwhile, are trapped between conflicting signals: Francisco Lindor, Luis Robert Jr., Jorge Polanco, Francisco Álvarez, Ronny Mauricio, and Kodai Senga are all on the injured list. Bo Bichette’s elite swing still looks disconnected—he currently owns the worst barrel rate of his career at just 3.4%. In the middle of the chaos, Juan Soto is enduring one of the worst offensive stretches of his recent career, yet around him, small signs of a more dangerous and less improvised lineup are beginning to emerge. That is what makes this edition of the Subway Series feel different. It does not arrive as a simple rivalry series on the calendar. It arrives at that uncomfortable point of the season when the first cracks start feeling real. When offensive struggles stop looking temporary. When teams begin understanding which parts of the roster truly work and which ones are still surviving more on reputation than production. And that is why this series feels far heavier than a typical May matchup. Because while the noise surrounding Juan Soto and Aaron Judge will dominate every headline, the true backdrop of this Subway Series feels deeper: two teams trying to prove there is still a more dangerous version of themselves hidden underneath all the inconsistency. The Yankees enter the series having lost five of their last six games, while the Mets just completed their first sweep of the season behind five home runs Thursday against the Detroit Tigers. Over the last decade, the Mets have controlled the Subway Series with a 25-23 record and a plus-33 run differential (253-220). If we narrow the sample to the last five seasons, the Mets own two series victories and three splits, including a 2024 sweep with wins at both Yankee Stadium and Citi Field, respectively. New York Mets vs. New York Yankees New York Mets New York Yankees Rk Season GP W L R R GP W L R R 1 2025 6 3 3 29 33 6 3 3 33 29 2 2024 4 4 0 36 14 4 0 4 14 36 3 2023 4 2 2 20 16 4 2 2 16 20 4 2022 4 2 2 13 13 4 2 2 13 13 5 2021 6 4 2 44 29 6 2 4 29 44 6 2020 6 3 3 29 29 6 3 3 29 29 7 2019 4 2 2 20 23 4 2 2 23 20 8 2018 6 3 3 27 25 6 3 3 25 27 9 2017 4 0 4 14 21 4 4 0 21 14 10 2016 4 2 2 21 17 4 2 2 17 21 11 2015 6 2 4 20 31 6 4 2 31 20 12 2014 4 2 2 21 19 4 2 2 19 21 13 2013 4 4 0 16 7 4 0 4 7 16 14 2012 6 1 5 21 32 6 5 1 32 21 15 2011 6 2 4 14 29 6 4 2 29 14 16 2010 6 3 3 19 18 6 3 3 18 19 17 2009 6 1 5 17 44 6 5 1 44 17 18 2008 6 4 2 38 25 6 2 4 25 38 19 2007 6 3 3 27 34 6 3 3 34 27 20 2006 6 3 3 30 35 6 3 3 35 30 21 2005 6 3 3 32 23 6 3 3 23 32 22 2004 6 4 2 43 38 6 2 4 38 43 23 2003 6 0 6 19 39 6 6 0 39 19 24 2002 6 3 3 29 27 6 3 3 27 29 25 2001 6 2 4 20 26 6 4 2 26 20 26 2000 6 2 4 24 25 6 4 2 25 24 27 1999 6 3 3 30 28 6 3 3 28 30 28 1998 3 1 2 8 16 3 2 1 16 8 29 1997 3 1 2 11 9 3 2 1 9 11 Totals 152 69 83 692 725 152 83 69 725 692 Heading into a promising weekend series that opens with a pitching matchup between Cam Schlittler and Clay Holmes, here are five storylines that could shape the direction of the Subway Series: 1. Juan Soto vs. Aaron Judge Everything starts, naturally, with Juan Soto and Aaron Judge, former teammates in 2024. Because while the marketing will sell this matchup as a battle between superstars, the interesting part is not simply who is performing—it is who will carry the heavier pressure. Judge still looks like the gravitational center of the Yankees lineup. Over the last ten days, he is slashing .278/.409/.583 with three home runs and a .992 OPS. Those numbers almost feel routine for him now, but behind the production lies a deeper issue: New York has needed virtually every Judge swing to keep the offense alive. Because around him, there are concerning signs. Paul Goldschmidt is probably enjoying his best offensive stretch of the season, posting a 1.256 OPS with three home runs—two of them leadoff shots—in eight games. But after that, the lineup collapses into a dangerous mixture of late swings, strikeouts, and rallies that never fully materialize. Jazz Chisholm Jr. has struck out 14 times in ten games. Ben Rice is hitting just .125. Austin Wells sits at .095. And then comes the statistic that changes the tone of the entire series: the Yankees enter without scoring a run over their last 15 innings. Since leaving Yankee Stadium, the offense has collapsed on the road, hitting .158 with runners in scoring position over the last six games. They have struck out 14 times while drawing only four walks. The only memorable productive swing was Trent Grisham’s three-run homer Tuesday that capped a five-run rally in the third inning. Since then, the Yankees have not scored again. On the other side, Soto is not arriving hot either. He is arriving under pressure. Although he hit his fifth home run of the season and drove in two runs Thursday during the Mets’ five-homer explosion to complete the sweep over Detroit, Soto is still searching offensively. His line over the last eight games stood at .138/.212/.310, far from the elite discipline and zone control that define his profile. But the context around Soto has started to change. The Mets do not look explosive offensively, yet they do appear to be finding a more functional structure. Carson Benge is beginning to look like a hitter finally understanding the rhythm of the major leagues. His .379 average and .971 OPS over the last eight games represent stability in front of Soto. His swings no longer look rushed. There is now intention behind them, especially against fastballs in the middle of the zone, and that changes the entire offensive dynamic for the Mets. The 21-year-old rookie A.J. Ewing has also made an impact in his recent debut with the Mets. After launching the first home run of his career Thursday against Tigers right-hander Keider Montero, Ewing has gone 3-for-9 with two extra-base hits, including a triple. He has also drawn four walks—more than his three strikeouts—and stolen a base. Mark Vientos has two home runs and seven RBIs over his last nine games, while Brett Baty, who homered Thursday, has also delivered quality at-bats. It is not a dominant offense. But it is one that seems to be searching for a more coherent identity. So once again, the expectation will center on how much impact Juan Soto and Aaron Judge can create, but the true turning point may depend on how hot the hitters around them become. 2. Can the Mets stop Cam Schlittler? One of the biggest arms to watch in the entire series is undoubtedly Cam Schlittler, who has posted a 0.57 ERA with 29 strikeouts and only one home run allowed across 31 2/3 innings over his last five starts. During that span, opposing hitters have slashed just .168/.223/.212 against Schlittler while generating 67 whiffs. But the interesting part is not only the ERA or the sheer volume of swing-and-miss. It is the way he controls at-bats. Some young pitchers survive by hiding on the edges of the strike zone. Schlittler appears to do the exact opposite: he challenges hitters. His fastball plays above the zone with late life, and that could become especially uncomfortable for this Mets lineup, which at times still depends too heavily on early-count contact. Against four-seam fastballs, the Mets have produced the worst on-base percentage (.304) in baseball and the second-worst ISO (.127), trailing only the Red Sox (.115). That is where one of the central conflicts of the series emerges, because Schlittler throws his four-seam fastball 44% of the time and attacks the upper part of the zone with 51% of those pitches. This advanced report probably will not surprise you: Lowest OBP against high four-seam fastballs this season Table context: The leaderboard is sorted by lowest OBP allowed among pitchers with at least 20 plate appearances ending on a high fastball, either inside or outside the strike zone. Behind Jacob deGrom, Schlittler owns the second-best whiff rate (32.3%) in this group of upper-zone fastball predators, as well as the second-best strikeout rate (38.3%), trailing only Paul Skenes (38.5%). That is not good news for the Mets lineup, because Soto is struggling. Bo Bichette arrives offensively lost, carrying a .369 OPS over recent days, although his .314 expected batting average against four-seamers and 61.8% hard-hit rate suggest he has also been somewhat unlucky. Without key hitters like Lindor, Robert, Polanco, and Álvarez, several secondary Mets bats still show problems adjusting to sustained velocity up around the hands. That is why Schlittler could completely control the rhythm of the game if he gets ahead in counts, especially while pairing the four-seamer with a devastating cutter that has held hitters to a .113 average without an extra-base hit in 57 plate appearances. The Yankees and Mets both arrive with inconsistent offenses, but Schlittler possesses the exact type of profile capable of turning a bad offensive week into a full-blown multi-day crisis. 3. Freddy Peralta and Clay Holmes could extend the Yankees’ offensive collapse Perhaps the most interesting matchup of the entire series is not Soto versus Judge. Perhaps it is Freddy Peralta versus the Yankees. Peralta represents exactly the kind of starter that has historically disrupted this lineup: elevated fastballs, hidden velocity, and enough slider usage to destroy aggressive swings. Now the question becomes whether Peralta will bring back his fastball the way he did in his last start, when he generated 13 whiffs against the Detroit Tigers on Tuesday. Eleven of those 13 misses (85%) came on the four-seam fastball. The rest were split between the changeup and slider. That was encouraging news for the Mets, although there is another layer here; the Yankees have crushed sliders all season, leading baseball with 14 home runs, a .260 ISO, and a 45.3% hard-hit rate against the pitch. So, which version of these Yankees will appear against Peralta? What adjustments will they make? We will find out soon enough. If we dive into the individual matchups, another fascinating detail appears immediately: Judge has faced Peralta three times and still does not have a hit against him, striking out twice. The sample is tiny, but it perfectly captures the visual conflict Peralta often creates for larger hitters. The ball seems to appear on top of them. Still, the history also carries warnings. Goldschmidt has hit two home runs against Peralta and owns an .887 OPS in the matchup. Cody Bellinger has also punished him historically with an OPS north of 1.100. That forces Peralta to pitch with more precision than aggression. Against this offensively limited version of the Yankees, he probably does not need to dominate the entire lineup—he simply needs to prevent Judge and Bellinger from changing the game with one swing, especially since Aaron Boone typically avoids starting Goldschmidt against right-handed pitching. On the Mets' side, Clay Holmes could quietly become one of the most important figures of the series. Holmes’ old problem has always been the same: when the sinker loses depth, everything unravels quickly. Early this season, opponents are finding the sinker more often. His whiff rate has dropped from 16.4% to 12.8%, and his strikeout rate has declined by 5.5%. The sinker remains the foundation of his mix, but now the sweeper has become the true put-away weapon, generating 52% of his strikeouts. If Holmes’ movement shows up, he could turn games into a sequence of weak grounders and uncomfortable swings. During this 15-inning scoreless streak, the Yankees look particularly vulnerable to that kind of pitching profile. New York is not simply enduring an offensive drought. The Yankees are also chasing too many pitches outside the zone and losing hard contact early in counts. Against an aggressive Holmes attacking below the strike zone, that can quickly turn into ten-pitch innings and easy outs. 4. Will the Yankees bullpen return to dominance? The Yankees bullpen enters the Subway Series with numbers that inspire both confidence and concern at the same time. The positive side is obvious enough: there is still plenty of swing-and-miss to finish important games. The group has recorded 17 strikeouts in 17 innings over the last six games, and arms like David Bednar and Fernando Cruz continue generating whiffs even when they do not look fully dominant. Bednar owns 13.5 strikeouts per nine innings during that stretch, while Cruz carries a 4.0 strikeout-to-walk ratio, signs that the Yankees still possess relievers capable of surviving traffic through pure stuff. But the problems emerge immediately afterward: too much hard contact and too many unstable innings. The bullpen owns a collective 4.76 ERA over the last six games, has allowed four home runs, and several relievers are living through outings where one mistake destroys the entire inning. Camilo Doval still does not look fully consistent inside the strike zone. Brent Headrick surrendered two home runs in just two innings. Paul Blackburn arrives especially vulnerable with three walks and a 2.25 WHIP in only 2 2/3 innings. Even the overall bullpen profile is starting to reveal something interesting: too many dangerous fly balls and not enough complete weak-contact suppression outside of what Tim Hill has provided, as he continues looking like the steadiest reliever in the group because of his ability to generate ground balls consistently. And that could matter greatly against the Mets. Because even if this offense is not exploding consistently, it is beginning to create offensive traffic ahead of Soto. If the Mets force games into the bullpen early—especially in situations where Aaron Boone must extend secondary relievers—the series could suddenly open the door to chaotic innings. The problem for the Yankees is that this no longer looks like a bullpen that simply enters and suffocates games automatically. Right now it looks more human. More vulnerable to the big inning. And in an emotional series like the Subway Series, that can change everything with one swing. The contrast between both bullpens could quietly become one of the defining themes of the weekend. While the Yankees enter with a 4.76 ERA over their last six games and several relievers vulnerable to hard contact, the Mets bullpen appears to be stabilizing at exactly the right moment. New York’s bullpen ERA sits at 3.16 over the last seven games, but the most revealing detail emerges once the disastrous outings from Tobias Myers and Craig Kimbrel are removed: the rest of the bullpen has combined for a microscopic 0.43 ERA. That completely changes the perception of the group. Devin Williams is once again generating uncomfortable swings with his changeup. Brooks Raley has been extremely stable. The Mets also enter with 30 strikeouts in 25 2/3 innings during that stretch. More than overwhelming dominance, the important detail is that the bullpen seems to be producing clean innings precisely when the Yankees are enduring one of their worst offensive stretches of the season. 5. Can the Mets solve the Yankees’ left-handed starters? The end of the series could ultimately be decided by a problem that has haunted the Mets for nearly the entire season: left-handed pitching. Behind Schlittler, Carlos Rodón and Ryan Weathers will close out the series. It just so happens that the Mets own the worst OBP in Major League Baseball against left-handed pitchers (.276). That turns Rodón and Weathers into massive threats for the final games of the weekend. Current Mets hitters have combined to hit just .203 (13-for-64) with 14 strikeouts across 72 plate appearances against them. Only three hitters have homered: Tyrone Taylor, Marcus Semien, and Luis Torrens. Soto is 0-for-4 with four walks and one strikeout. Bichette is 4-for-14 (.286) with two RBIs and three strikeouts. That is why names like Soto, Bichette, and Benge become so important in this matchup. The Mets do not need to destroy Rodón. But they do need to avoid the offensive pattern that has followed them for months: late swings, nonexistent offensive traffic, and rallies dying before they even begin. Meanwhile, Ryan Weathers could quietly play a major role in Sunday’s finale. Soto has gone 4-for-8 (.500) with a home run against Weathers, while Semien is 2-for-5 with a double. The rest of the projected lineup will mostly be facing him for the first time. For many of them, their struggles against left-handed pitching this season tell the story clearly: Player Split Year G PA BA OBP SLG OPS HR RBI K% BB% MJ Melendez vs LHP 2026 2 2 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 50.0% 0.0% Juan Soto vs LHP 2026 19 45 .146 .222 .293 .515 1 2 20.0% 8.9% Bo Bichette vs LHP 2026 24 53 .188 .264 .313 .577 1 8 15.1% 9.4% Brett Baty vs LHP 2026 12 21 .222 .333 .278 .611 0 1 38.1% 9.5% Tyrone Taylor vs LHP 2026 19 36 .235 .235 .441 .676 2 7 22.2% 0.0% Marcus Semien vs LHP 2026 20 39 .257 .333 .314 .648 0 1 20.5% 7.7% Mark Vientos vs LHP 2026 20 43 .268 .302 .415 .717 1 3 14.0% 2.3% Carson Benge vs LHP 2026 12 21 .278 .381 .278 .659 0 1 38.1% 14.3% A.J. Ewing vs LHP 2026 2 4 .333 .500 1.000 1.500 0 1 50.0% 25.0% Luis Torrens vs LHP 2026 11 19 .353 .389 .471 .859 0 4 10.5% 5.3% The numbers speak for themselves. Soto, Bichette, Baty, and Semien will need to make quick adjustments. Benge and Ewing bring some stability in small samples, although the strikeouts remain significant. So. the story here is not simply Soto versus Judge. It is about two teams trying to prove they still have a dangerous version of themselves hidden underneath all the inconsistency. The Yankees are searching for offense again. The Mets are trying to prove they can survive velocity and left-handed pitching after finally securing their first sweep of the season. And in the middle of all that, New York once again finds itself inside a series where every inning feels heavier than normal. View full article
  2. There are starts where a pitcher simply gets lucky. Others where hard contact goes directly into gloves. And then there are the starts where something genuinely changes — where the pitching itself starts to look different even before you check the box score. Such was the case when Freddy Peralta led the way in the Mets’ 10-2 win over the Detroit Tigers at Citi Field. The Mets had not scored at least 10 runs at home since April 23, when they beat the Minnesota Twins 10-8. Peralta delivered six strong innings on 100 pitches, struck out seven, and allowed two runs, including a solo homer by Dillon Dingler. His only shaky moment came in the second inning, when Dingler demolished a hanging curveball on an 0-2 count. That didn't stop Peralta's ruthless attack on the strike zone. Wenceel Pérez slapped a single while flailing at an 0-1 fastball, and Gage Workman doubled on a low-inside changeup. Spencer Torkelson capped the inning with a sacrifice fly to left field, giving Detroit a 2-0 lead. The only barrel Freddy allowed in the inning was Dingler’s 101.8 mph home run. The Mets responded quickly against the vulnerable mix of right-hander Jack Flaherty. Mark Vientos tied the game 2-2 with a single in the third, and Carson Benge gave New York a 3-2 lead with an RBI single to left in the fourth. The knockout blow came with a six-run fifth inning, followed by two more runs in the seventh, including a triple and top prospect A.J. Ewing’s first major-league RBI in his debut. The offensive support mattered for Peralta who regained his dominance while producing his best start of the season. Where did the difference show up? The adjustment in his pitch mix generated 13 whiffs, allowed just a 17.6% HardHit rate, and only a .118 expected batting average. He had not allowed a hard-hit rate below 20% in a start since September 4, 2025, when he was still pitching for the Milwaukee Brewers. That night, he faced 20 Philadelphia Phillies hitters — an elite lineup — striking out eight and generating 14 whiffs. From a pure dominance standpoint, the stuff looked sharp. But here’s the interesting difference: only six of those 14 whiffs in that 2025 outing came on his fastball. Last night at Citi Field, the story changed completely. Peralta generated 11 whiffs with his four-seamer alone. It was not about velocity. It was about command. His fastball touched 97.2 mph, but averaged 94.4. Peralta had not generated double-digit whiffs with his fastball since September 16, 2025. Across his previous 11 starts, including last night, his highest combined total of fastball whiffs over back-to-back outings had been only 12. He threw the fastball 69% of the time against Detroit’s lineup, mixing in his changeup (15%), slider (12%), and curveball (4%). The key detail here is that the veteran right-hander established the fastball without depending exclusively on the changeup or slider to finish hitters in two-strike counts. After the second inning, the Tigers never adjusted at the plate. Peralta was still averaging 94.8 mph on the fastball by the sixth inning. That is what makes this recent stretch from Freddy Peralta so interesting: the return of his confidence in the fastball. The reduction in command mistakes. The way his secondary pitches once again complement the entire arsenal by generating chase. These last four starts are not simply telling the story of a lower ERA. They are telling something more important: the gradual return of the dominant Freddy Peralta profile we saw in 2025. Not exactly the same pitcher, mind you. But the same identity. It's the same arm that generated weak contact in key moments. The same fastball that hitters struggled to elevate. Through nine starts this season, Peralta is generating ground balls at a rate 3.5% higher than last season (36.8%), while allowing his lowest hard-hit percentage (36.2%) since 2021. The same disappearing changeup underneath barrels has returned. And above all, the same feeling that opposing swings arrive late even when hitters know what is coming. For the Mets, that is encouraging news, especially after watching Peralta battle through his first five starts of the season. Dec IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO BF ERA SO% HR% XBH% GB% W-L:1-2 26.2 19 12 12 4 10 0 28 112 4.05 25.0% 3.6% 5.4% 34.1% W-L:2-1 22.2 22 7 5 1 9 0 22 98 1.99 22.4% 1.0% 5.1% 33.3% So, what stands out here? First, the innings are leaning more toward durability over these last four outings. Peralta has been resolving plate appearances more efficiently. The strikeout rate has dipped slightly, but he is dramatically reducing power damage and extra-base hits with runners on base. The extra-base-hit rate is nearly identical, yet he has allowed only one home run while maintaining a similar ground-ball profile. The other area where his season could truly turn is in his adjustments during two-strike counts. Last night, three of the seven hits he allowed came with two strikes: Kevin McGonigle single, 90 mph exit velocity (first inning, leadoff hitter, nine-pitch at-bat with seven pitches after two strikes). Dillon Dingler solo homer, 102 mph EV (second inning, leadoff hitter). Colt Keith double, 89 mph EV (third inning, leadoff hitter). Each situation came against the first hitter of the inning, which limited the overall damage somewhat. Still, it leaves an interesting question. Split Year G GS SO ERA SO/9 SO/BB Two Strikes 2018 16 14 96 2.67 16.0 4.4 Two Strikes 2019 39 8 115 4.03 17.8 4.3 Two Strikes 2020 15 1 47 1.99 18.7 6.7 Two Strikes 2021 28 27 195 1.62 18.5 7.2 Two Strikes 2022 18 17 86 1.50 16.1 4.5 Two Strikes 2023 30 30 210 3.10 18.1 6.8 Two Strikes 2024 32 32 200 2.10 16.8 4.9 Two Strikes 2025 33 33 204 1.72 16.0 5.2 Two Strikes 2026 9 9 50 3.07 15.3 3.6 This season, Peralta has posted the lowest SO/BB ratio (3.6) of his career in two-strike counts. His strikeout rate in those situations has also dipped to a career-low 15.3 K/9. Opponents’ on-base percentage (.252) in two-strike counts is his highest since 2019 (.267). But that could begin to change if these recent adjustments continue expanding. The 2025 Version of Freddy Peralta: Velocity, Elevation, and Broken Contact The Freddy Peralta of 2025 built one of the best seasons of his career around a relatively simple idea: never allow hitters to square up the fastball. His four-seamer was devastating: .209 batting average allowed .381 slugging percentage allowed 22.8% whiff rate Just a .239 BABIP But the real key was the quality of contact. Hitters produced hard contact only 41.6% of the time against the fastball. In isolation, that number may not sound elite, but compared to the rest of his recent arsenal, it represented near-total damage control. The changeup complemented the formula perfectly: .173 batting average allowed .271 slugging percentage allowed .242 wOBA 35.2% whiff rate And the slider quietly became one of the nastiest pitches in his arsenal: .176 batting average allowed .235 slugging percentage allowed 51.5% whiff rate Everything in the repertoire worked around the same principle: uncomfortable swings and harmless contact. That is exactly what disappeared early this season. The First Five Starts: Too Much Damage on Contact Peralta’s early numbers were not disastrous. He was still striking hitters out. He was still generating whiffs. But something underneath was broken. The fastball was getting hit far too hard: 52.9% hard-hit rate .428 xSLG .349 xwOBA The changeup, historically one of his best secondary pitches, looked even worse: 77% hard-hit rate .412 average distance allowed Only a 24.5% whiff rate And the slider lived in complete chaos: 100% hard-hit rate 50% barrels per batted ball event 1.416 xSLG That was not the Freddy Peralta of 2025. That was a pitcher surviving more on raw talent than execution. The velocity remained. The spin remained. Even the strikeouts remained. But the bad swings disappeared; opponents were arriving at the baseball with far too much authority. The Last Four Starts: The Return of Weak Contact This is where the analysis becomes fascinating. Peralta did not suddenly reinvent himself. He did not show up throwing 97 mph every inning. He did not overhaul his mechanics. What changed was subtler — and probably far more sustainable. The contact started dying again. The clearest evidence is the fastball: Hard-hit rate dropped from 52.9% to 36.8% xSLG dropped from .428 to .296 Slugging allowed dropped from .311 to .208 And all of it happened with virtually identical velocity: 93.6 mph over the first five starts, 93.9 mph over the last four. That usually points to one thing: location. Peralta's fastball is living above the zone again. It is getting on barrels late again. It is generating swings underneath the baseball instead of loud contact. The changeup has also started resembling the 2025 version of himself. Even though the batting average allowed remains elevated in the small sample, almost every underlying indicator improved: Hard-hit rate dropped from 77% to 23.5% Whiff rate climbed from 24.5% to 31% Contact quality collapsed dramatically That matters far more than an inflated .412 BABIP. In fact, it may be the clearest sign that Peralta is pitching better than some of the surface-level numbers suggest. The Most Important Detail: Peralta Looks Like Himself Again The surface numbers are not identical, but the profile is becoming familiar again. The dominant Peralta of 2025 was a pitcher who: Avoided barrels Limited dangerous launch angles Generated late swings Turned the fastball into the centerpiece of everything That is exactly what is reappearing now. His recent fastball is allowing even less slugging (.208) than it did in 2025 (.381). The changeup is generating empty swings again. And the slider, while still inconsistent, has stopped giving away catastrophic contact. The difference between April and May does not look physical. It looks like precision, execution, and command. And when a pitcher keeps the same stuff but suddenly slashes hard contact this aggressively, it usually means he has rediscovered the exact point where the entire arsenal starts working together again. Freddy Peralta has not fully returned to his 2025 form yet. But for the first time this season, the road back is finally starting to appear.
  3. Image courtesy of © Ron Chenoy-Imagn Images There are starts where a pitcher simply gets lucky. Others where hard contact goes directly into gloves. And then there are the starts where something genuinely changes — where the pitching itself starts to look different even before you check the box score. Such was the case when Freddy Peralta led the way in the Mets’ 10-2 win over the Detroit Tigers at Citi Field. The Mets had not scored at least 10 runs at home since April 23, when they beat the Minnesota Twins 10-8. Peralta delivered six strong innings on 100 pitches, struck out seven, and allowed two runs, including a solo homer by Dillon Dingler. His only shaky moment came in the second inning, when Dingler demolished a hanging curveball on an 0-2 count. That didn't stop Peralta's ruthless attack on the strike zone. Wenceel Pérez slapped a single while flailing at an 0-1 fastball, and Gage Workman doubled on a low-inside changeup. Spencer Torkelson capped the inning with a sacrifice fly to left field, giving Detroit a 2-0 lead. The only barrel Freddy allowed in the inning was Dingler’s 101.8 mph home run. The Mets responded quickly against the vulnerable mix of right-hander Jack Flaherty. Mark Vientos tied the game 2-2 with a single in the third, and Carson Benge gave New York a 3-2 lead with an RBI single to left in the fourth. The knockout blow came with a six-run fifth inning, followed by two more runs in the seventh, including a triple and top prospect A.J. Ewing’s first major-league RBI in his debut. The offensive support mattered for Peralta who regained his dominance while producing his best start of the season. Where did the difference show up? The adjustment in his pitch mix generated 13 whiffs, allowed just a 17.6% HardHit rate, and only a .118 expected batting average. He had not allowed a hard-hit rate below 20% in a start since September 4, 2025, when he was still pitching for the Milwaukee Brewers. That night, he faced 20 Philadelphia Phillies hitters — an elite lineup — striking out eight and generating 14 whiffs. From a pure dominance standpoint, the stuff looked sharp. But here’s the interesting difference: only six of those 14 whiffs in that 2025 outing came on his fastball. Last night at Citi Field, the story changed completely. Peralta generated 11 whiffs with his four-seamer alone. It was not about velocity. It was about command. His fastball touched 97.2 mph, but averaged 94.4. Peralta had not generated double-digit whiffs with his fastball since September 16, 2025. Across his previous 11 starts, including last night, his highest combined total of fastball whiffs over back-to-back outings had been only 12. He threw the fastball 69% of the time against Detroit’s lineup, mixing in his changeup (15%), slider (12%), and curveball (4%). The key detail here is that the veteran right-hander established the fastball without depending exclusively on the changeup or slider to finish hitters in two-strike counts. After the second inning, the Tigers never adjusted at the plate. Peralta was still averaging 94.8 mph on the fastball by the sixth inning. That is what makes this recent stretch from Freddy Peralta so interesting: the return of his confidence in the fastball. The reduction in command mistakes. The way his secondary pitches once again complement the entire arsenal by generating chase. These last four starts are not simply telling the story of a lower ERA. They are telling something more important: the gradual return of the dominant Freddy Peralta profile we saw in 2025. Not exactly the same pitcher, mind you. But the same identity. It's the same arm that generated weak contact in key moments. The same fastball that hitters struggled to elevate. Through nine starts this season, Peralta is generating ground balls at a rate 3.5% higher than last season (36.8%), while allowing his lowest hard-hit percentage (36.2%) since 2021. The same disappearing changeup underneath barrels has returned. And above all, the same feeling that opposing swings arrive late even when hitters know what is coming. For the Mets, that is encouraging news, especially after watching Peralta battle through his first five starts of the season. Dec IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO BF ERA SO% HR% XBH% GB% W-L:1-2 26.2 19 12 12 4 10 0 28 112 4.05 25.0% 3.6% 5.4% 34.1% W-L:2-1 22.2 22 7 5 1 9 0 22 98 1.99 22.4% 1.0% 5.1% 33.3% So, what stands out here? First, the innings are leaning more toward durability over these last four outings. Peralta has been resolving plate appearances more efficiently. The strikeout rate has dipped slightly, but he is dramatically reducing power damage and extra-base hits with runners on base. The extra-base-hit rate is nearly identical, yet he has allowed only one home run while maintaining a similar ground-ball profile. The other area where his season could truly turn is in his adjustments during two-strike counts. Last night, three of the seven hits he allowed came with two strikes: Kevin McGonigle single, 90 mph exit velocity (first inning, leadoff hitter, nine-pitch at-bat with seven pitches after two strikes). Dillon Dingler solo homer, 102 mph EV (second inning, leadoff hitter). Colt Keith double, 89 mph EV (third inning, leadoff hitter). Each situation came against the first hitter of the inning, which limited the overall damage somewhat. Still, it leaves an interesting question. Split Year G GS SO ERA SO/9 SO/BB Two Strikes 2018 16 14 96 2.67 16.0 4.4 Two Strikes 2019 39 8 115 4.03 17.8 4.3 Two Strikes 2020 15 1 47 1.99 18.7 6.7 Two Strikes 2021 28 27 195 1.62 18.5 7.2 Two Strikes 2022 18 17 86 1.50 16.1 4.5 Two Strikes 2023 30 30 210 3.10 18.1 6.8 Two Strikes 2024 32 32 200 2.10 16.8 4.9 Two Strikes 2025 33 33 204 1.72 16.0 5.2 Two Strikes 2026 9 9 50 3.07 15.3 3.6 This season, Peralta has posted the lowest SO/BB ratio (3.6) of his career in two-strike counts. His strikeout rate in those situations has also dipped to a career-low 15.3 K/9. Opponents’ on-base percentage (.252) in two-strike counts is his highest since 2019 (.267). But that could begin to change if these recent adjustments continue expanding. The 2025 Version of Freddy Peralta: Velocity, Elevation, and Broken Contact The Freddy Peralta of 2025 built one of the best seasons of his career around a relatively simple idea: never allow hitters to square up the fastball. His four-seamer was devastating: .209 batting average allowed .381 slugging percentage allowed 22.8% whiff rate Just a .239 BABIP But the real key was the quality of contact. Hitters produced hard contact only 41.6% of the time against the fastball. In isolation, that number may not sound elite, but compared to the rest of his recent arsenal, it represented near-total damage control. The changeup complemented the formula perfectly: .173 batting average allowed .271 slugging percentage allowed .242 wOBA 35.2% whiff rate And the slider quietly became one of the nastiest pitches in his arsenal: .176 batting average allowed .235 slugging percentage allowed 51.5% whiff rate Everything in the repertoire worked around the same principle: uncomfortable swings and harmless contact. That is exactly what disappeared early this season. The First Five Starts: Too Much Damage on Contact Peralta’s early numbers were not disastrous. He was still striking hitters out. He was still generating whiffs. But something underneath was broken. The fastball was getting hit far too hard: 52.9% hard-hit rate .428 xSLG .349 xwOBA The changeup, historically one of his best secondary pitches, looked even worse: 77% hard-hit rate .412 average distance allowed Only a 24.5% whiff rate And the slider lived in complete chaos: 100% hard-hit rate 50% barrels per batted ball event 1.416 xSLG That was not the Freddy Peralta of 2025. That was a pitcher surviving more on raw talent than execution. The velocity remained. The spin remained. Even the strikeouts remained. But the bad swings disappeared; opponents were arriving at the baseball with far too much authority. The Last Four Starts: The Return of Weak Contact This is where the analysis becomes fascinating. Peralta did not suddenly reinvent himself. He did not show up throwing 97 mph every inning. He did not overhaul his mechanics. What changed was subtler — and probably far more sustainable. The contact started dying again. The clearest evidence is the fastball: Hard-hit rate dropped from 52.9% to 36.8% xSLG dropped from .428 to .296 Slugging allowed dropped from .311 to .208 And all of it happened with virtually identical velocity: 93.6 mph over the first five starts, 93.9 mph over the last four. That usually points to one thing: location. Peralta's fastball is living above the zone again. It is getting on barrels late again. It is generating swings underneath the baseball instead of loud contact. The changeup has also started resembling the 2025 version of himself. Even though the batting average allowed remains elevated in the small sample, almost every underlying indicator improved: Hard-hit rate dropped from 77% to 23.5% Whiff rate climbed from 24.5% to 31% Contact quality collapsed dramatically That matters far more than an inflated .412 BABIP. In fact, it may be the clearest sign that Peralta is pitching better than some of the surface-level numbers suggest. The Most Important Detail: Peralta Looks Like Himself Again The surface numbers are not identical, but the profile is becoming familiar again. The dominant Peralta of 2025 was a pitcher who: Avoided barrels Limited dangerous launch angles Generated late swings Turned the fastball into the centerpiece of everything That is exactly what is reappearing now. His recent fastball is allowing even less slugging (.208) than it did in 2025 (.381). The changeup is generating empty swings again. And the slider, while still inconsistent, has stopped giving away catastrophic contact. The difference between April and May does not look physical. It looks like precision, execution, and command. And when a pitcher keeps the same stuff but suddenly slashes hard contact this aggressively, it usually means he has rediscovered the exact point where the entire arsenal starts working together again. Freddy Peralta has not fully returned to his 2025 form yet. But for the first time this season, the road back is finally starting to appear. View full article
×
×
  • Create New...