Today's question: Does Danny Graves Suck?Of course everyone knows that the answer is yes, but let's try to go a little deeper than that.Willie and Danny himself see good things, even from Saturday's 5-run (1 earned) effort (nymets.com):]Moving in the right direction: Asked about Danny Graves' performance on Saturday night -- after the right-handed reliever allowed five runs (one earned) in two-thirds of an inning -- Randolph was complimentary, saying that he didn't believe Graves had looked as bad as his final line indicated. And perhaps there's something to that. Graves also seemed mildly satisfied with the outing -- not that the runs scored were acceptable, but because he can see the baseball dancing on its way to the plate again. "I think my sinker is back to where it was with the late action on it," said Graves. "Obviously, the velocity is not there, but I'm convinced it's not going to be there. So I'm just concentrating on trying to get my movement back." The 32-year-old has been something of a reclamation project for the bullpen this season after being cut loose by the Cincinnati Reds earlier in the summer. The results have been mixed, and Graves points to his 2003 campaign, in which he threw 169 innings for Cincinnati -- mostly as a starter -- as a major reason why his pitch speed has dropped. "I'm not one to make excuses, but now I'm learning to pitch with different velocities," he said. "I'm perfectly healthy, and we've done tests a number of times this year to make sure everything's fine. Maybe it's just wear and tear throughout the years." Here's a Game Log:Note: ERA is cumulative.DATEGAMEWLERAGIPHRERHRBBKNP-SGO-AOJUN 14@OAK000.001100000013-93-0JUN 16@OAK0013.501143300122-141-1JUN 22@PHI0010.1210.20000018-51-0JUN 25@NYA007.711241110232-202-2JUN 28PHI008.101222220036-244-2JUN 29PHI007.041100001116-110-2JUL 02FLO006.4810.21000019-81-0JUL 05@WAS005.79110000017-51-1JUL 09@PIT008.681023311015-90-0JUL 16ATL008.71113110009-63-0JUL 21SDN007.941120000021-122-1JUL 27@COL007.431241102241-252-2AUG 04MIL006.91110000006-41-2AUG 10@SDN006.6010.21000008-42-0AUG 18PIT006.19111000009-63-0AUG 20WAS006.6110.125102025-121-0AUG 21WAS005.891210000113-93-2005.891718.12716124610From this it would appear that he has as many decent starts as bad starts, which is about what you would expect from a back-of-the-pen guy. Of course, this info doesn't look at inherited runners to inherited runners scored, so it's lacking. Is the grass greener with a Heath Bell? If nothing else, I'd rather have Bell because we can train the young guys now on a team that I still don't think makes the playoffs.