Two schools of thought here. Both make sense to me. 1) A young player should speak his mind. Say what comes from the heart, and don't worry about being politically correct. Leads to interesting interviews and lets the reader learn more about him, but at the same time a kid may say something dumb in the heat of an emotional moment and may offend people. 2) A player should go with the cliches until he learns how to give a good interview. The good part is that a kid learns his place and doesn't say anything dumb until he has more experience and seasoning in the bigs. The only bad part I see is that there is nothing good to read for a while. (and the media doesn't get to write easy articles). I was in Camp 1, as seen in other threads, but after reading both I realize there isn't much downside to Camp 2, except that I'd have to read about more interesting players than the "boring, cliche-spouting rookie". Of course it's not as black and white as that, but that's a good start on the subject.