Ceetar
-
Posts
25,313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis
New York Mets Videos
2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings
New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors
New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources
2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Ceetar
-
Gwreck wrote: Mejia isn't listed on the Mets' website as 60-day DL but he must also be there as well. Not sure on that. Someone told me that to do so would activate major league service time, something the Mets probably don't want to do. As it is they didn't have to waste an option year on him this year since he didn't play.
-
Edgy DC wrote: It's unofficial as of yet, and I think they're due to join the team tomorrow, but I'm certain it's just a matter of a paper transaction. Probably adding Ike Davis to the 60-Day. think they need another transaction though. one for Val, one for Schwinden. Was that Harris' last AB?
-
metirish wrote: I'd have sworn that Val Pascucci had been up with the Mets before, in fact I was so sure he was that I went to MBTN to see what number he wore before. I am either conflating him with another player or there was talk of him coming up in the past. Mike Hessman? I dunno.
-
bmfc1 wrote: MetsWFAN Schwinden, Pascucci, and Baxter added from Buffalo, will be here tomorrow. Pascucci will wear number 15. 15? how dare he.
-
I love how we went most of the season without updating this thread. oops.
-
Gwreck wrote: Reyes SS Turner 2B Duda RF Wright 3B Pagan CF Bay LF Satin 1B Nickeas C Pelfrey P Tejada is good to go, so Reyes will indeed get his day off. [crossout]Reyes SS[/crossout] Tejada SS Turner 2B Duda RF Wright 3B Pagan CF Bay LF Satin 1B Nickeas C Pelfrey P
-
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote: They're both under team control. They both have similar issues. Parnell's just a couple of years younger. Acosta's doing much, much better right now. So, yeah, why not? because much much better is pretty subjective. prior to last night Parnell had 3 hits, 2 walks, and 1 run (a worthless home run) in his last 7 appearances. Assuming the Mets are married to the idea of one closer, I'd tend to learn towards the guy with the better K rate in Parnell and work on getting him to walk less people, which is part of the reason Acosta's doing better now. Sure, gotta keep Acosta around. he's earned a job. And sure, if he proves himself through the next month, and looks good in Spring Training you can consider him for the closer. I just don't think it's going to happen.
-
Edgy DC wrote: Until a few weeks ago, you'd figure that, if the Mets were looking internally for their top reliever for next year, it was looking like Parnell was a 70% bet and Beato maybe a 30%. But the string of success that Acosta is on has to get him into the picture, no? I'd make him number one reliever tomorrow. If the team was in a playoff race, they probably would, and maybe would have already. I doubt it. Not saying he doesn't maybe deserve it off the last two months, but I think that goes more towards erasing his bad first two months and earns him a job in the pen. I doubt Parnell (or whoever it ends up being) will be anointed closer before mid-march anyway. It's certainly possible Acosta can force his way into the picture, but my money's still on Parnell.
-
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote: "Hi. I'm Not Jason Bay." That's not fair. Bay has 22 more hits! (It's nearly 200 more PA, but who's counting right?)
-
yeah, Keith certainly doesn't sugar coat much. He was still killing the fish defense yesterday.
-
John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: I missed a bit before that but did they say Valdespin did something stupid? I'd just turned it on too. didn't catch that.
-
Burkhardt (on the Strasburg media circus): "Strasburg hasn't shown any ability to have any personality so far."
-
Edgy DC wrote: Bay ties it! Why didn't I go tonight?! yeah, why didn't you?
-
Frayed Knot wrote: I see Paulino going to give the toe a go. Did we ever get word on the conditions of the hands/wrists of Tejada & Thole? it's sore. find out tomorrow. I think Collins is serious about resting Reyes.
-
Gwreck wrote: Daniel Herrera, 914 yay westchester? Thought for sure Satin would be 913. now he's likely 915. poor guy.
-
John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: Makes you forget Elmer Dessens ever lived. who? I spent about an hour this afternoon trying to remember Mike Hessman.
-
Stinson walks. He walked at the plate before giving up a walk as a pitcher.
-
Stinson looked good, scoreless inning to start, 2k. At bat now.
-
John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: Uniform numbers: Stinson 63 Satin 3 I just checked MBTN and Stinson is in fact going to be the first-ever number 63 for the Mets. I long ago decided that if I ever bought a Mets jersey (which is unlikely) I'd get 63, for two reasons: No Met had ever worn it, and it's the year of my birth. Now one of those two reasons is shot. Kind of wild that this is the first time a Met has worn a number as the team closes in on 50 years. Granted, it's a spring training number. I have to consult one of my favorite books to learn how many other numbers below 70 have never been worn. Can't be too many. Are we certain on this 63 for Stinson? Roster has him listed as 64 (although that was also his number in Spring Training) he was just 64 in the game, so..
-
Josh Stinson is 913. (That's Kansas City, KS if you were curious)
-
Frayed Knot wrote: Ceetar wrote: chase whaever that guys name was. new guy for the 4th. 6-1 Mets. That was Ross Detwiler out and Collin Balester in. Sounds like a change of seats in Parliment. I wasn't invested enough to remember who they are. They're Nats. David gets doubled off on a Pagan fly to deeeep rightfield. Looked gone, wind may have held it in. David was practically home already when it was caught.
-
chase whaever that guys name was. new guy for the 4th. 6-1 Mets.
-
Wright slaughters a baseball, 3-run shot, Mets up. (Bay hits it in the air to center. ladeeeda)
-
*cough cough* game thread for today? one of you?
-
Thole and Tejada both negative. Thole will see a hand specialist tomorrow to be sure. Collins asked Adam Rubin to identify the bone he was talking about for him in the post-game while pointing to the bone on the wrist just below the hand. (Adam didn't actually know)
