Edgy DC wrote: Really, in the history of this team, has any in-season bullpen acquisition come in and made the difference? I can't think of too many for any team, really. The closest I can think of is Guillermo Mota, who came in and picked up where Duaner Sanchez left off in 2006, but (a) the Mets got him for nothing, ( we were heading to the playoffs with or without him, (c) he ended up sucking it up in the post-season, (d) he was a-cheating, and (e) the Mets should have shunned him and instead paid him good money to take them for a ride, get suspended, and pitch like snot in 2007 when we needed him. Meanwhile, we've given up valuable players like Jason Isringhausen and Jason Bay. Half of Xavier Nady too. We lost this, in the end, on a few stupid grounders that split the infield. The answer isn't to trade for a more perfect bullpen. The answer is to build more margin for error. This brings me back to the idea of "what can we do to get more out of our relievers that we have"? Maybe there is something, scouting wise, that they could be doing differently in preparation. And maybe it's simply usage. But I haven't hated the Mets usage that much this year. I loved going to Parnell for the save in that spot, and playing the infield back, or positioning a step or two left or right and that's a quick 2-3 inning for Parnell. Ultimately he left balls where they could hit them, but all Ks and grounders is really what you want from your relievers and I hope they don't let a small sample of results sour them on using Bobby as much as possible.