Even if the umpire wasn't strictly wrong, it was still a weird call to make. The rule doesn't actually say that the ball has to be transferred to his hand cleanly. It says, "If the fielder has made the catch and drops the ball while in the act of making a throw following the catch, the ball shall be adjudged to have been caught. In establishing the validity of the catch, the fielder shall hold the ball long enough to prove that he has complete control of the ball and that his release of the ball is voluntary and intentional." Revere wasn't in the act of throwing, so the first part of that doesn't apply. The question is whether he had complete control before he released it, and I think it's pretty clear that he did. I'm glad it turned out to be not that important, except maybe to the Phillies' feeling of the world being against them, which I'm all in favor of. In favor of their feeling that way, that is, and in favor of the world actually being against them. Stick it to those Phils, world.