Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Theoldmole

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    6,311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Theoldmole

  1. I absolutely do not care about the money end of it. It’s not my money. My only concern is whether this makes them a better team. And a worry that settles over me every time the Mets get a star infielder from the American League. The record is not good.
  2. It’s Ryan time again..
  3. Ah. I missed that moment. I had been at dinner in a restaurant, following on AtBat. I excused myself and went out to the car when that inning started, so I could catch David’s at bat, but caught nothing but static.
  4. I think it was great that Mickey started him alongside David tonight.
  5. I was sobbing just listening to Howie and Josh. But then watching the video of him leaving the field really did me in.
  6. I missed something...what did he do?
  7. ONE MET ART — For reference, check out the original poem by Elizabeth Bishop The art of losing isn’t hard to master; so many games seem filled with the regard to be lost that their loss is no disaster. Lose nearly every day. Put out to pasture Yoenis, David Wright, and Syndergard. The art of losing isn’t hard to master. If you don’t score, the losing can go faster: DeGrom can mow them down, and his reward A bullpen headed swiftly toward disaster. And when the offense conjures up a blaster, The pitching staff’s hoist by its own petard. The art of losing isn’t hard to master. Then trade talk. Syndergard, DeGrom, and vaster — Put Nimmo and Conforto on the card, And now you are approaching a disaster. We’re saving management for last, for A loss in ownership would not be hard. the art of losing’s not too hard to master, Losing the Wilpons would be no disaster.
  8. I was thinking they should let him go three or four, and then put Thor in.
  9. He should.
  10. Any word on the rain?
  11. What do we know about Plawecki?
  12. It's clear up here. Still raining at Citi?
  13. 1963 has the innocence. 2017 too busy. In general I like art over photography for the covers.
  14. How did I get the wrong link there? Fixed now.
  15. https://www.newyorker.com/news/sporting-scene/what-the-spending-bill-could-mean-for-minor-league-baseball-players The New Yorker on the little-known baseball provision in the new spending bill, which gives a $60-a-month raise to minor league baseball players making the minimum. “It’s disturbing, to say the least,” Garrett Broshuis, a St. Louis-based attorney representing the players in their case against M.L.B., said on Thursday, of the spending-bill provision. From 2004 to 2009, Broshuis was a pitcher in the San Francisco Giants’ farm system. “You have players living below the poverty line and now the league is going to be exempt from paying them?”
  16. And now Todd Frazier. An enjoyable evening.
  17. So far, my kinda manager.
  18. That’s considerate.
  19. Reynolds dealt for cash considerations. What’s the difference between cash considerations and cash?
  20. The Mets don’t have a good record of letting middle infielders go to the Nats.
×
×
  • Create New...