You wonder why Johnson has a reputation as a defensive catcher then? edit: oh yes, experience. Since I saw the Hyde thing, I've been intermittently looking for anything online that contradicts that account of his defense... and coming up empty. Fangraphs UZR, B-R fielding numbers, traditional fielding stats, anecdotal evidence... it all paints a picture of a poor-to-very-poor receiver with half-decent throwing numbers. I wonder if lazy FO folk-- ahem, from other teams, of course-- just looked at his MLB experience, his wretched batting stats, and figured he MUST be good defensively to get that much playing time. I'm gonna guess they had their reasons for bringing his ass into camp. In Rottino, May, and Johnson, they get three guys (1) who can catch, (2) but aren't necessarily catchers, (3) can play all around, (4) have hit, (5) but have not in the bigs, and (6) at least in two of these cases, are on the right side of 30. I think they did their research and decided that this was a profitable archetype to invest in with their AAAA-designated dollars.