I would imagine most baseball writers who've had 10 or more years in the BBWAA have at some point been given responsibility beyond reporting and gotten a column in which to opine beyond the facts, on matters moral, cultural, and aesthetic. (And if you believe John Keats, those all dovetail.) Their history as reporters should have taught them to build these opinions on a credible foundation of substantiated facts, so I'm going to disagree a bit with Vic here. I don't think they're failing because their real skill set is in researching and reporting substantiated facts, but because it ain't, or if it ever was, those skills have long since dried up, as their careers have done a lot better for them as purveyors of opinions powered by hubris and volume, rather than sober research and cross-checking.