TransMonk wrote: Adam Rubin wrote: The Mets appear to have pivoted to Walker after striking out in their attempt to land Ben Zobrist. I vastly prefer one year of Walker to four years of an aging Zobrist. I don't see any way that this trade would not trump signing Zobrist as the better move for the Mets both in the short term and the long. Well short-term maybe not in that it cost us Niese (even if that's not as big a hit as it would have been 2-3 years ago) and that Zobrist may be the better player right now. Long-term is more iffy in that there won't be the big commitment to an aging player (who may or may not be earning his keep by then) but we will have to fill the job again next year. The upside scenario is one where this gives us the time to nurture a home-grown replacement and/or the financial flexibility to make moves in the for '17-'19 without the Zobrist contract in the way. But, like you, I banking on scenario #3 as the best option right now and officially give this deal my stamp of approval. Kind of an emotional trade in the sense that it's a straight-up one-for-one deal involving two guys who were drafted and 10 (Niese) and 11 (Walker) years ago and have never known another org. Walker, as I mentioned at the top of this thread, was also a hometown boy who was extremely popular in Pittsburgh after being just an 11th round draft pick. Niese always had that birthday connection to the club (b. 10/27/86 - something which out-of-town announcers often found fascinating) and was a good egg during his time here giving the club more than one normally has the right to expect from a 7th round choice. And, as noted, it also spells the end of Murphy's time here.