A couple of sample games from last night (Wed) Cubs 1 - Pirates 0 At Pitt so they went the full 9 innings, but just one run on a total of 9 hits plus 7 walks. 67 total batters came to the plate (75 is about average) and there were ZERO mid-inning pitching changes ... and yet the game still managed to take 3:05 Angels 1 - Oakland 3 8-1/2 innings, 4 runs, 14 hits + 7 walks, 2 mid-inning pitching changes, 71 batters = 3:10 What the fuck are they doing during these games? How long would they have taken if there were like runs and hits and scoring and stuff? It's bad enough that the 2:40 or so average many of us grew up with is now 3:05-3:10, but games like these are the type that used to run [u:3udl17jk]2[/u:3udl17jk]:10 or maybe 2:20, but unless there were like 15 different replay reviews (which itself would be disturbing) those games sound like there was a lot of standing around doing nothing and THAT, more than the time of game itself, is the bigger problem.