I don't want a set of rigid rules governing number retirement. But I'd like there to be some sort of guidelines and mine would look something like this: 1) a career NYM or at least a solid majority of his career as one 2) HoF inductee or at least pretty darn close to it 3) Was a member/citizen of good standing while a NYM - Keith falls short on #1 & #2, although I understand this is as much about his announcing career as his playing one - Cater checks off #2 though isn't close on #1 - Gooden and Strawberry are barely there on #1, not close on #2, and iffy as hell on #3 - Piazza checks #2 and is at least close on #1. I wouldn't have tabbed him, though I'm not going to go nuts on it. - Mays obviously has #2 covered tho isn't close on #1, although I understand there are extenuating circumstances (promises) here. - Koosman: #1 yes, #2 not close. - Wright: #1 yes, #2 no. Probably gets the sympathy vote. - Reyes - #1 yes, #2 not close - Mookie, HoJo, Krane, Beltran, Cleon, etc.: Please stop. Strawberry has the club HR record and Doc second only to Seaver in wins , so there is that Indeed; I don't understand the hate. Yes they screwed up but haven't we all? Saying that someone falls short of the ultimate team honor isn't "hate". These guys are already in the NYM HoF. That should be considered a terrific honor but, by expanding the retired number roster, not only is the team (read: Cohen) degrading the status of number retirement but he's also treating the HoF status as if it's almost a meaningless gesture.