Tough to tell if/how much they complained about that as the booth caught up to it kind of late so bitching may have been going on off-camera. I did see the ump pointing to his own head several moments earlier during the first replay but failed to interpret what it meant. Either way, they can carp all they want but there's no appeal on that one. So even if the runner was going to be obviously safe it's still, in effect, that old neighborhood call of, 'Do-Over!!' Well, the pitch itself isn't a do-over but the contact means a dead ball so it negates everything that occurs afterward. oe: Now that I think about it, it's not a dead ball. In a case like this the ump indicates interference (his own in this case but player interference/obstruction would work the same way) then allows the play to continue. Had the Mets gotten the out on the SB attempt despite the jostling of Torrens's arm they can opt to take the result of the play - which of course they would. That the runner was safe is what negated the result and sent the runners back to where they started.