batmagadanleadoff wrote: Brett Butler had a good and lengthy career but it wouldn't have been much of either had he not been a top-notch defensive player for much of that time. Brett Butler was one of his generations best leadoff hitters, maybe even the best, second only to Rickey, finishing in the top 25 in MVP voting regularly for almost a decade. If Brett couldn't field a lick, he'da still succeeded as a top notch DH. Jason Tyner was no Brett Butler, glovework notwithstanding. Of course he wasn't - even as Butler was always the ideal to which a player of Tyner's skills would hope to emulate. Now the odds of him ever being Brett Butler were always remote in the same way the odds of Baltimore 2010 #3 overall pick Manny Machado becoming the next ARod are minute even though both are a tall, multi-skilled SSs of Hispanic origins from Miami taken at age 18 at the top of the draft. But even if Tyner's offensive talents were enough to have made him a sort of BB-lite for a while the margin of error for doing so would have been a helluva lot larger had he been a go-get-em CF rather than the noodle-armed and so-so gloved corner guy he turned out to be. Bottom line: if you're drafting a guy on account of one outstanding skill, make sure that there is at least something else in the guy's toolbox to fall back on. Otherwise, if that one tool slips from great to merely decent, you're in deep shit.