Murphy owes us beer for tonight's game. Not to read too deeply into these things but Alderson evidently was asked in one of those season-ticket-holder chats as to his attitude on trading Muffy and he was sorta noncomittal, at least it's how it read. I know you ca't give assurances but here's the magic quote: "Look, we have a real appreciation for Dan Murphy. Murphy is somebody who is an offensive player, who has really done some things this year to improve himself as an offensive player. His on-base percentage is much higher than it has been in recent years. He goes the other way. So there's no question in terms of this ballpark, he's been a plus. You know, we talk about all the time: We're looking for players that are willing to play in New York or can play in New York. He hits in New York. He hits in this ballpark. ..." He went on to say we shouldn't consider what we hear on twitter to be reliable. I have no idea what Muffy would bring back in a deal not who would want him, but he's not without value, will be getting more expensive next year, and could be replaced in the lineup everyday by Flores. Yeah, I read all that the other day. My first thought was that back in the old MOFO days there'd be screaming about the GM just giving a bunch of non answers, as if the only thing they'd accept in true SHOW US THE PLAN!!!! style is for Sandy to give an exact date and time on when Murphy was to be traded and what we'll get in return. I personally think he's actually been OK defensively this year, or at least certainly hasn't hurt them with the glove as much as he's helped with the stick. It's just that last night's game featured him K-ing on a bad pitch w/2 on (just as the Cards got 2-out hit after 2-out hit) and then followed that up with the double error inning (even though I'm sure he was only charge with one). Mainly it suxx with him not showing up on the one day recently when Wright did - but that's pretty much been the story of this season.