Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

batmagadanleadoff

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    26,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by batmagadanleadoff

  1. Ashie62 wrote: Bernard Gilkey Close. Not.
  2. 1. Wright - 1432 2. Reyes - 1300 3. Beltran - 878 4. Mcreynolds - 791 5. Ordonez - 720 6. Stearns - 695 7. Brooks - 640 8. Hundley - 612 9. 10.
  3. 1. Wright - 1432 2. Reyes - 1300 3. Beltran - 878 4. Mcreynolds - 791 5. Ordonez - 720 6. 7. Brooks - 640 8. Hundley - 612 9. 10.
  4. metirish wrote: Delgado Carlos, not Wilson Nope.
  5. seawolf17 wrote: Olerud? See above.
  6. John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: Olerud Ranks 11th on this list.
  7. John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: Hunt Keep on huntin'.
  8. metirish wrote: Cliff Floyd Uh uh.
  9. Edgy MD wrote: Lee Mazzilli 1986.
  10. One guess per post. Among those players who never played in a World Series game for the Mets, name the 10 players with the most career hits as a Met.
  11. If the season ended right now, the Mets and Nats would play a tiebreaker for the right to play the second place team in the West for the Wild Card.
  12. Sneak peek still from the upcoming Jackie Robinson movie: "Some day, Jackie, they're gonna name a rotunda after you."
  13. Oh yeah. I forgot about this newest eyesore. In case no one else mentioned it. Because they can't leave well enough alone. Because, often, doing nothing is the best solution. Oh well. Send in the clowns.
  14. A pitcher doesn't throw a shutout, or a no-hitter, all by himself. Fielders must make the plays behind him. And the catcher has to hold on to the third strike. I don't believe that Schaefer correlates perfectly with what we'd consider dominant performances. For example, the most dominant thing that a pitcher could do is strike out all 27 batters in a perfect game. But for Schaefer purposes I'd award a pitcher more points if he pitched a perfect game where every batter popped out to that pitcher.
  15. I didn't even get it. I had to google "Steve Irwin". And I still don't get it. I mean I don't get the supposed joke. I get the bad taste part, but only after googling Irwin.
  16. Benjamin Grimm wrote: You're just trying to be argumentative. There's a difference between a nine-inning effort and a single at bat. I know. What I ought to have written was that offense (run scoring) is half the game and pitching/defense (run prevention) comprises the other half. And from that view, a pitching performance alone, no matter how dominant, can't be worth five out of the 10 points.
  17. Benjamin Grimm wrote: The idea is that a player can get a maximum of 6 points, but 10 points are awarded. When a pitcher throws a complete game shutout, he's done everything expected of him (hence the 6), and those other 4 points are for the guys who hit the ball and catch the ball. That's one way of looking at it. I suppose that a bottom of the 9th inning pinch hitter in a tie game who singles in the winning run has also done all that was expected of him. But six points worth?
  18. I canceled an end of month trip to Miami to catch the Mets. Bummer. Man do I love the new Marlins stadium.
×
×
  • Create New...