OK, I'll accept that since your studies have been thoroughly discussed on this site (various fora). (calming down) But if I had said that this was a friend who's baseball aptitude and evaluation skills I trusted had told me that he had seen the guy play and this was his opinion, don't you have to accept that as much as any other source? Would you ask for a tape recording of the conversation? Or just accept it as an opinion? And what makes his opinion more or less credible that anyone else's? In fact, I gave you his credentials with his scouting report. Or if someone says IIRC, do you ask for a link to their memory? I'm getting philosophical here, not personal. So please don't take it that way. I'm trying to understand your way of accepting/ not accepting information. And BTW- I was Directory of Quality for a major telecom company and sat on their software quality review board. So please don't patronize me calling yourself an "information specialist". I've project managed the implementation of systems that I'm certain have provided for the security of you and your family as you have gone through Newark Airport. Later