Gwreck Ballot: Yes: Carlos Beltran Adrian Beltre Todd Helton Andruw Jones Joe Mauer Gary Sheffield Billy Wagner No: David Wright (regrettably) Abreu Pettitte Buehrle Alex Rodriguez Ramirez Utley Everyone else on the ballot is below this level (eg. not seriously considered).
The only reason to trade prospects for Soto now (rather than waiting a year) is that he's the difference between playoffs/not playoffs in 2024. There seems to be no expectation that Soto won't test the free agent market next season.
Do you remember Paul Sewald as a Met? I'm very glad for his successes but do you really think he's the shutdown closer you want in Game 7 with a two run lead? I think the Diamondbacks are in a great spot but I am nervous for them.
Edgy MD wrote: If you have the biggest budget ever, why sink so much of it into starting pitching in an era when — between caution and injury — starting pitchers get an ever-decreasing opportunity to impact the game? If you're unwilling to depart from the prevalent thinking, you can be minimizing the advantage of a large budget, rather than maximizing it. Because starting pitching was a way to rapidly improve the team without committing to long term contracts? Trea Turner or Aaron Judge - or even Carlos Correa - were all available last season (and Cory Seager, Marcus Semien, and Freddie Freeman the year before) but required contracts of substantially different length than the 2 or 3 years committed to Scherzer and Verlander.
A Boy Named Seo wrote: The Mets will in be hamstrung by both the ghosts of Scherzer and Verlander next year, too (and maybe for taxation purposes $17.5M more for Verlander in '25). This hardly seems like something that gets charged to the account of Eppler. He certainly could have moved more of the money when trading Verlander/Scherzer. Steve Cohen was very candid about the fact that he preferred to eat the money and acquire better prospects.
Especially given what the Diamondbacks have done so far as the #6 seed, one additional angle to consider is what the Mets might have done with the departed players and if they could have won the 10 extra games needed to get that #6 seed.
Answer is: John Olerud. 1993 WS, for Toronto against Curt Schilling* 1999 NLDS, off Randy Johnson 1999 NLCS, off Glavine and Smoltz 2001 ALDS and ALCS, for Seattle 2004 ALCS, for the Yankees, off Pedro Martinez. *Not in the HOF but added for context.
Curtis played in the postseason with 5 teams (DET, NYY, NYM, LAD, MIL) but only homered for the first 3. Ventura played in the postseason with 4 teams (CHW, NYM, NYY, LAD) but only homered for the first two teams.
Johnny Lunchbucket wrote: Don Baylor Also an excellent guess. He made the postseason with 5 teams (Baltimore, Angels, Boston, Oakland, and Minnesota) but only homered for 3.
Sheffield's a good guess: he played in the postseason/hit postseason homers with Miami, Atlanta, and the Yankees, but never with the Dodgers. Beltran played in the postseason with 5 teams but only homered for 3: Houston, Mets, and Cardinals. The Met actually hit a homer with the Mets in the postseason. All are wild-card era players.
Great trivia question (degree of difficulty: impossible). JD Martinez's solo homer made him the 7th player to hit a postseason home run for 4 different franchises. Met content = 1 but I'd have had trouble coming up most of the other 6.