="Edgy DC"]Sage's Plan C Group: Player / Age / Career OPS+/2004/2005/2006 Durham / 35 / 106 115, 107, 127 Loretta / 35 / 101 136, 96, 82 Valentin / 37 / 96 88, 62, 112 Sage's Plan D Group: Player / Age / Career OPS+/2004/2005/2006 Aurilia / 35 / 104 80, 99, 112 Kennedy / 31 / 92 98, 97, 90 DeRosa / 32 / 90 59, 98, 106 Lugo / 31 / 92 94, 105, 94 I can see buping Aurilia up and/or dropping Valentin down, but I see no reason to recommend a Lugo upgrade. i amended Edgy's list to include 2004, 2005, and 2006, i don't care what these guys did years ago if i had to order them i'd go: Durham, Aurilia, Loretta, DeRosa, Lugo, Valentin, Kennedy but thats irrespective of defense, age, and contract demands. if i factor in my own opinions of their defense, their ages, and i assume that they all want 2 years i'd go Durham, Loretta, Aurilia, Lugo, DeRosa, Kennedy, Valentin. Valentin was great for the Mets in 2006, but if he wanted 2 years i'd have to pass, he's the oldest man on the list and is responsible for 2 of the 5 worst seasons put up by these 7 guys in the last 3 years (21 seasons total) I've talked about liking Loretta in the past, but with the year he had in '06 I'd hesitate to give him more than a year with a team option as well. I've gotten the impression that DeRosa isn't very good defensively, but if i were told htat he's as good as the other guys on this list he'd be someone i'd take a gamble on along with Aurilia or Lugo. I'd give Durham 2 years but i have a feeling he wants 3 as he's the guy with the best name recognition here and its his last big payday.