Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

IGT 07/10 - Nationals at Mets - Time to Rock Yet Again!


Recommended Posts

Posted


Runs. Let's get some.

Baserunners. Let's start with base runners. Preferably not after two out. But, you know, whatever you can do.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Next time I have trouble sleeping, I will think of the Mets batters (other than Jose) today.


Posted (edited)


bmfc1 wrote:
Next time I have trouble sleeping, I will think of the Mets batters (other than Jose) today.


Instead of counting sheep you can count pop-ups.


Edited by Guest
Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)


Hey De Aza. Want outta my doghouse? Walk this off.


Edited by Guest
Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Gotta love De Aza!


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


You knew the game was over when DeAza was the final batter. If he's still on the roster when we return from the break, I'll be disappointed.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


He should have been DFA'd weeks ago but perhaps Sandy won't admit his mistake or he thinks he can find a sucker for a trade. Either way, having him up in that spot was terrible. If Yo was n/a than Terry didn't have a choice as Loney had to PH for the pitcher.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Marlins win, just to add to the sting...


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Remind me again, what does SHaMs stand for?


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Ashie62 wrote:
The first half of the season was excruciating.

Yeah, I dunno... feel kinda lucky to only be six out. Rest up, boys!


Posted


bmfc1 wrote:
He should have been DFA'd weeks ago but perhaps Sandy won't admit his mistake or he thinks he can find a sucker for a trade. Either way, having him up in that spot was terrible. If Yo was n/a than Terry didn't have a choice as Loney had to PH for the pitcher.


Even if Cespedes is unavailable (and he had to be, or else fire Terry now) I would send Loney up there. the worst they can do is walk him (and THEY don't know Cespedes can't hit at all, send him out on deck for the pitcher), and then i'd rather see Syndergaard with the tying run on 2nd needing a single instead of deAza with the tying run on 1st needing a double. its possible Syndergaard wasnt available either... I'd use deGrom.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


You make a good point Nymr83. They saved Loney with 2 outs for something that never happened.


Posted


Nymr83 wrote:
i'd rather see Syndergaard with the tying run on 2nd needing a single instead of deAza with the tying run on 1st needing a double. its possible Syndergaard wasnt available either... I'd use deGrom.

That's some really stretchy thinking. And that's even ignoring the fact that you need James Loney to get you from one scenario to the other.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Mets Guy in Michigan wrote:
You knew the game was over when DeAza was the final batter. If he's still on the roster when we return from the break, I'll be disappointed.


I was at the game with YoungerPooper and my favorite aunt (also a Met fan, if not quite as intense).

"Who is this, again? The guy who hit himself," says she, in the ninth.

ME: "De Aza. Game's over, I think."

AUNT: "Really?"

ME: "Probably. I hope to hell I'm wrong, but... yeah."

YoungerPooper: "Does that mean we should boo HIM, too?" (We'd been having an ongoing conversation about Murph and Harper, and why fans were booing; she still cheers Murph, quietly.)

ME: "No. Probably not. He seems like a nice man, but I just wish someone else were playing his position, because he's not playing very well."

YoungerPooper: [After a second] "I'm still cheering Murphy."


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Nymr83 wrote:
i'd rather see Syndergaard with the tying run on 2nd needing a single instead of deAza with the tying run on 1st needing a double. its possible Syndergaard wasnt available either... I'd use deGrom.

That's some really stretchy thinking. And that's even ignoring the fact that you need James Loney to get you from one scenario to the other.


No - my argument is that you are in a better position with Loney up compared to de Aza - even if you think they'll walk him. if they don't walk him then you undeniably have the better hitter at the plate anyway.

What would you do if you were the Nationals' manager and Loney comes up with Cespedes holding a bat on deck? unless you have a mole in the Mets locker room telling you Cespedes can't swing is there really any way you can chance pitching around Loney? Terry outsmarted himself by only taking into account what he knew and not thinking of what the Nats didn't know.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


For what it's worth, I think that Rivera was still available so saving Loney for the unlikely event that de Aza got on wasn't the only option.


Posted


Nymr83 wrote:
Nymr83 wrote:
i'd rather see Syndergaard with the tying run on 2nd needing a single instead of deAza with the tying run on 1st needing a double. its possible Syndergaard wasnt available either... I'd use deGrom.

That's some really stretchy thinking. And that's even ignoring the fact that you need James Loney to get you from one scenario to the other.


No - my argument is that you are in a better position with Loney up compared to de Aza - even if you think they'll walk him. if they don't walk him then you undeniably have the better hitter at the plate anyway.

What would you do if you were the Nationals' manager and Loney comes up with Cespedes holding a bat on deck? unless you have a mole in the Mets locker room telling you Cespedes can't swing is there really any way you can chance pitching around Loney? Terry outsmarted himself by only taking into account what he knew and not thinking of what the Nats didn't know.

I certainly agree that I would have sent C�spedes to the on-deck circle.


  • 1 month later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...