batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 Zvon wrote:Maybe it's for the best. Remember, these are the Mets. He probably woulda ended up overthrwowing too many pitches in the freezing cold and then probably ruined his career.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 It was all that gushing about "cool customer" and "poise" from Gary and Keith in the last inning. I'm convinced./Adjusts foil hat//Cues WFAN number on cell phone for postgame call
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:It was all that gushing about "cool customer" and "poise" from Gary and Keith in the last inning. I'm convinced./Adjusts foil hat//Cues WFAN number on cell phone for postgame callAnd Gary did mention that he was hitless over his last 9 innings counting the last three innings of his outting vs. the Phils. When he said that I cringed a lil.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 Up to 100 pitches. Aside from the hit and the 2 walks this has been a perfect game for Harv.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 I agree w/Mex. Let him try and finish the inning.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 You can actually hear Keith leer when he talks about the kid. It would be a little alarming if I weren't feeling the exact same way right now.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 I like this situation. Parnell's first save chance with as big a cushion as possible.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 I prefer cushions too big for saves.Kinda messy offense today except for one inning when the team couldn't be stop't.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 Those drives by the Twins don't even reach the wall. It seems every other one of our hits smack off that wall. Keep it under control Parnell.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 What I said last Monday bears repeating here: "Folks, we got ourselves one seriously good pitcher on our hands here".Terry PH-ing with Valdy and then putting Nieuwenhuis in for CF defense seemed like a waste of a player who maybe, just maybe, would be needed later.Either PH with Nieuwy or leave Speen in the play CF.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 What I said last Monday bears repeating here: "Folks, we got ourselves one seriously good pitcher on our hands here".Terry PH-ing with Valdy and then putting Nieuwenhuis in for CF defense seemed like a waste of a player who maybe, just maybe, would be needed later.Either PH with Nieuwy or leave Speen in the play CF.Agreed, but that's just Terry bein Terry. What he's doing with the outfield reminds me of the way Gil platooned the right side of the field (RF,2nd Base, 1st base)in '69. A little bit,anyways.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 I have nothing against platooning; Baxter for Duda made absolute sense in this game for instance.But having already burned Baxter and then using Valdespin for a PH, it didn't make sense to pull Byrd and then use your last remaining OF in Nieuwenhuis (remember that emergency OF Turner was already in a DH). If Terry believes that Nieuwenhuis's defense is that much better than Cowgill and Valdy (questionable) then use him to PH, and if Terry thinks Valdespin was that much more likely to get in the 5th run than Nieuwenhuis then he can survive one inning with him in CF. And remember that this all started because he wanted to go lefty/righty for Cowgill (it's not like we were PH-ing for the pitcher here) so he wound up using three different CFs to cover the final four outs of the game.IOW, he was over-doing it there at the end IMO
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 The only entree in the Historic Met journal for 4/13/13: "Buck did not hit one today."
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 Mebbe, but 'Spin is the better offensive threat at this juncture, and Nieuey the better defender. It's not like the Mets were lookin' down the road at a likely attrition war. This is the American League where those almost never happen anyhow. You can be a little more liberal with your bench usage, and I imagine Terry knows that.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 I have nothing against platooning; Baxter for Duda made absolute sense in this game for instance.But having already burned Baxter and then using Valdespin for a PH, it didn't make sense to pull Byrd and then use your last remaining OF in Nieuwenhuis (remember that emergency OF Turner was already in a DH). If Terry believes that Nieuwenhuis's defense is that much better than Cowgill and Valdy (questionable) then use him to PH, and if Terry thinks Valdespin was that much more likely to get in the 5th run than Nieuwenhuis then he can survive one inning with him in CF. And remember that this all started because he wanted to go lefty/righty for Cowgill (it's not like we were PH-ing for the pitcher here) so he wound up using three different CFs to cover the final four outs of the game.IOW, he was over-doing it there at the end IMONo, you're right. I agree. I think most folks here would too. op:(on preview?)saw Edges post when hitting enter. Good thing I said most,lol.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 I probably agree too, but I see the other side as appealing too. I'm certain I'd agree 100% under real baseball rules.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 Edgy MD wrote:Mebbe, but 'Spin is the better offensive threat at this juncture, and Nieuey the better defender. It's not like the Mets were lookin' down the road at a likely attrition war. This is the American League where those almost never happen anyhow. You can be a little more liberal with your bench usage, and I imagine Terry knows that.I disagree. I think Nieuwenhuis is better all around. Hell, I think Baxter is better than both of them anyway, and I'd have rather him in CF.
Guest themetfairy Guests Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 batmagadanleadoff wrote:I see the images today!
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted April 13, 2013 Posted April 13, 2013 Ceetar wrote:Edgy MD wrote:Mebbe, but 'Spin is the better offensive threat at this juncture, and Nieuey the better defender. It's not like the Mets were lookin' down the road at a likely attrition war. This is the American League where those almost never happen anyhow. You can be a little more liberal with your bench usage, and I imagine Terry knows that.I disagree. I think Nieuwenhuis is better all around. Hell, I think Baxter is better than both of them anyway, and I'd have rather him in CF.Well, OK. But Valdespin is out-hitting Nieuwy this year in the bigs. And he out-hit him last year both in the bigs and the mnors.Baxter was already in the game.
Recommended Posts