Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 People actually care which businesses the Mets do business with? Could probably dig up 'dirt' on half, if not more, of the companies on any given team's list of sponsors. As long as the money is green..
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted February 25, 2013 Author Posted February 25, 2013 batmagadanleadoff wrote: Any day now, they'll send Jeff Wilpon south of the border to strike a deal .I can see the news story now:"As part of a continuing efort to improve the pitching staff, the New York Mets have announced the signing of ex-major league pitcher Fernando Valenzuela and invited him to their major league Spring Training camp in Port St. Lucie."Later
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted February 26, 2013 Posted February 26, 2013 Gwreck wrote:Want to hear about the Mets finances from someone other than Howard Megdal? No problem, the Post has you covered.The team is expecting to lose more than $10 million this year, after bleeding red the past two seasons, while attendance is projected to fall for a fifth straight year, The Post has learned.Yeah, those are the team's own projections.
ashie62 Old-Timey Member Posted March 27, 2013 Posted March 27, 2013 Don't know how Forbes does this but the Mets clock in 6th in value ay 811 Millionwith a 2012 Operating loss of 2.4 Million, a mere bag of shellshttp://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/mets/post/_/id/63054/forbes-mets-value-811m
Lefty Specialist Old-Timey Member Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 The problem with the rear-view mirror is that objects are always larger than they appear.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 And the problem with bats out of Hell is that they're always gone by the morning sun.
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 And the problem with the future is that it ain't what it used to be.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 Ashie62 wrote:Don't know how Forbes does this but the Mets clock in 6th in value ay 811 Millionwith a 2012 Operating loss of 2.4 Million, a mere bag of shellshttp://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/mets/post/_/id/63054/forbes-mets-value-811mWhat happened to 'projected loss of $70 million"? hell, wasn't that the amount budgeted for? It's all just creative accounting..
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 Where's the $70 million figure coming from?
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 Edgy MD wrote:Where's the $70 million figure coming from?I know I remember hearing something last year about the projected losses for 2012, I think it was $70 million.. I'll try to google for it later see if I can dig it up if no one else happens to remember. I've always been skeptical of these numbers and I always wonder what it does or doesn't include. My guesses were always that that big loss number was strictly Mets revenue against Mets payroll, not taking into account things like SNY and naming rights and maybe not even MLB licensing payouts, but I wish it was spelled out somewhere.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 The word "projected" had me thinking we were talking about the coming season.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 $70 million as an operating loss was definitely cited quite possibly for the 2011 season IIRC -- a number which seemed overly large to me in that if you could lose that much in one year turning a profit in any year seemed almost impossible otherwise. IOW, who knows the accuracy of the source of these types of reports.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted March 31, 2013 Posted March 31, 2013 Read this in the paper today and consider it the best article written about our guys this off season.Mets must be smarter once they start spendinghttp://www.nypost.com/p/sports/mets/mets_must_be_smarter_once_they_start_UqaVxMfedx29ZvNer68RWL
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted March 31, 2013 Posted March 31, 2013 �The big thing for me is it feels like the Mets are stuck in some kind of purgatory,� an official from another NL team said recently, on the condition of anonymity. �They didn�t blow up their club like Houston did, but they also aren�t a serious threat in the NL East behind Washington, Atlanta, and even Philadelphia.Filed before the Santana injury was known to be a KO, but Baseball Prospectus called the division suchly.Washington: 86-76 / --Atlanta: 83-79 / 3 GBNew York: 82-80 / 4 GBPhiladelphia: 81-81 / 5 GBMiami: 69-93 / 17 GBI guess that BP's predictions work from a mean of many outcomes and so they usually include divisions bunched tighter than they will end up after the one outcome that is a real-life season. But it suggests that, while the Mets are in purgatory, they are neither stuck there nor doomed to an uninteresting season.(Unless Duda stinks it up some more. Then all bets are off.)
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts