Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Double ties it. Homer wins.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


I'd say that looks and feels about right.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Edgy DC wrote:
Edgin getting seriously squeezed and bases are loaded.

Technically a save situation, and so Terry goes to Frank Francisco, because it's the law.


Yeah, and also because Edgin retired just 2 of the 5 batters he faced.

And please re-read the "squeezed" part. Come on.

Francisco, pitching terribly, now has the tying run on third.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Oh, good. Good. This IS good, right?


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Edgin wasn't squeezed
There are no excuses for this inning by anyone.

Yes he was. That's not an excuse but a reality confronting a manager. If you feel different, that's fine, but spare me the "Yeah, and..." sarcasm. I didn't walk anybody and neither did you.


Posted


lol. It couldn't end in a routine way.

Well, it was both! A mostly good game and a dash of torture. Mets Win!


Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
Edgin wasn't squeezed
There are no excuses for this inning by anyone.

Yes he was. That's not an excuse but a reality confronting a manager. If you feel different, that's fine, but spare me the "Yeah, and..." sarcasm. I didn't walk anybody and neither did you.


Edgin threw 20 pitches and hit the strike zone (or got a swing) 9 times. In between getting two guys out (FO + K) he walked a guy on 4 pitches, walked a guy on 5 pitches, and missed the zone by 2-1/2 feet when his 0-1 pitch drilled Freddie Freeman up under the back of his neck.

Even if you're arguing that that S/B ratio should have been - what, 11/9 rather than 9/11? - do you really think there was no justification in removing him and would have left him in to face, in all probability, RH-swinging PH David Ross (.273/.360/.473 -- and .306/.385/.510 vs LHP) with the bases loaded and that Terry did so only because the Closer Alarm Bell in his head went off?


Posted


I think, I think, I think.

I think there were at least two guys I'd prefer before Francisco, and three counting Edgin. They could have been up earlier and been brought into a stabler situation. Francisco needs demotion in his status and is hardly an improvement on anything. I'd bring the right guy in when he can help, not the designated closer exactly when the situation becomes a save situation.

I disagree about how many times Edgin hit the strike zone. I disagree with designated closers. I disagree to going to one there even if he is the best pitcher. I think it's demonstrably evident that Francisco missed the strike zone more consistently or decisively than Edgin or anybody. And I disagree that I deserved your sarcasm. But I opened it up with how I criticized the move, so I guess I'll clean my own house.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...