Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 The Top Fifteen 15s in Met HistoryCarlos Beltran, 2005-2011Jerry Grote, 1966-1977George Foster, 1982-1986Al Jackson, 1962-1965Jose Vizcaino, 1994-1996Matt Franco, 1996-2000Rick Aguilera, 1987-1988Ron Darling, 1989-1991Claudell Washington, 1980Richard Hidalgo, 2004Jeff McKnight, 1989Don Aase, 1989Brady Clark, 2002Butch Benton, 1978Kevin Elster, 1992Class of '81, Outside, Looking In:Dave Roberts, 1981Brian Giles, 1981At least six of these guys, to my knowledge, wore a different number in addition to 15, which is pretty strange, because 15 is nothing to sneeze at.Pretty funny what similar animals Washington and Hidalgo were, but Claudell rebuilt his career after his half season with the Mets, and Ricardo just faded.
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 Franco ahead of Vizcaino, methinks.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 The gremlins asked the gnomes to do some math. The gnomes said they did but they actually just called up baseball-reference.com, which gave Vizcaino a total of 1.5 WAR with the Mets, and Matt Franco a blushworthy -.3.I don't think WAR is particularly fair to pinch-hitters or relievers, not taking into account the high-leverage situations in which they more frequently appear, but that's a large gap. Or so the gremlins say.
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 If you're ranking by Metliness, Franco wins that one.
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 Stop using stats as a crutch, especiallly when you're comparing apples and oranges due to playing time. Vizcaino was worthless offensively for some terrible teams. Franco was an important cog on multiple contending teams.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 Really, I meant to compare Mets to Mets, batters to batters, and 15s to 15s.Viz was a good player. Had the best-ever offensive season as a Met shortstop before Reyes came along.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 seawolf17 wrote:Stop using stats as a crutch, especiallly when you're comparing apples and oranges due to playing time. Vizcaino was worthless offensively for some terrible teams. Franco was an important cog on multiple contending teams.Franco was USED as an important cog on multiple contending teams.A few key moments-- and their accompanying Metliness-- notwithstanding, he was actually kind of an inconspicuously awful cog (See also: "Lenny Harris").
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 Viz was a better player than many remember for the Mets but his journeymanism vs. Franco's relative Met bloodlines IMO makes Franco a more representative Met No. 15 than Vizcaino. But I'll put it to the MBTN readership, if that exists anymore.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 Yeah, feel free to build a blog post off of this.I like that I (I think) coined a nickname in "Viz" and now it's catching on.
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 There was an article in a scorecard during the Vizcaino era titled "Nobody Beats the Viz" -- The Wiz being a big Mets sponsor then.
G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted July 27, 2011 Posted July 27, 2011 There's probably some killjoy advanced statistic that will douse cold water on my recollections, but I remember thinking Vizcaino was darn good between 1994 and 1996, certainly a steal for Anthony Young. Was my runner-up all-time SS to Harrelson until Ordonez (now Harrelson is my runnerup to Reyes).But even without deducting points for going to the MFYs and fucking us over in Game One 2000, I'd still take M. Franco over Viz when 15s are being thrown around. Points will always be added for fucking over MFYs.
Recommended Posts