Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Edgy DC wrote:Showcasing Izzy in front of his potential buyers? Maybe?someone did suggest that he wanted to get to 300 saves and they'll give him the opportunity.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 And while Izzy is closing, Parnell has slid quite comfortably into the "scare the crap out of the fans in the eighth inning" bullpen spot.Later
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 TransMonk wrote:Maybe. I think he's the right choice anyhow given his experience.the "right choice" to do what, exactly? To help the Mets develop their next closer? No? Oh, you mean to win more games THIS year. Well, even that's a coin flip, given his peripherals (as compared to Parnell and Beato), but that can't be what Sandy has in mind for the balance of the 2011 season.He's rebuilding Izzie's value for a deadline deal. Otherwise, this is just a stupid waste of valuable time in the development of closers for this organization's future.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Vic Sage wrote:TransMonk wrote:Maybe. I think he's the right choice anyhow given his experience.the "right choice" to do what, exactly? To help the Mets develop their next closer? No? Oh, you mean to win more games THIS year. Well, even that's a coin flip, given his peripherals (as compared to Parnell and Beato), but that can't be what Sandy has in mind for the balance of the 2011 season.He's rebuilding Izzie's value for a deadline deal. Otherwise, this is just a stupid waste of valuable time in the development of closers for this organization's future.Yes, Parnell having to face Pujols with two on in a 2-run game hurt his development because it was in the 8th inning.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Two on? Bases were totally jizzed, Cee.
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Yes, Parnell having to face Pujols with two on in a 2-run game hurt his development because it was in the 8th inning.well at least we agree on something.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Edgy DC wrote:Two on? Bases were totally jizzed, Cee.doh, how could I forget the awesome defensive play by The 7 to keep the ball in the infield?
TransMonk Old-Timey Member Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Pitching with a 2 run lead in the eighth vs. pitching with a 2 run lead in the ninth...what's the difference in terms of the "development of a closer"?
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 TransMonk wrote:Pitching with a 2 run lead in the eighth vs. pitching with a 2 run lead in the ninth...what's the difference in terms of the "development of a closer"?well obviously since it was the 8th inning Parnell just couldn't get the adrenaline going, which is why he loaded the bases.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 The sarcasm awash in this thread is enough to drown a man.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Edgy DC wrote:The sarcasm awash in this thread is enough to drown a man.I like it.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted July 20, 2011 Posted July 20, 2011 Ceetar wrote:Yes, Parnell having to face Pujols with two on in a 2-run game hurt his development because it was in the 8th inning.I especially like this one.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.