Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Guest Swan Swan H
Guests
Posted


Pagan is making a case for himself.

Willets, my friend Gordon pointed out that on Wednesday the Nats and Mets led off with the Christian and the Pagan.


  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


Cohen brings up "catchers balk."

I've heard the term, don't recall it ever being called.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


How hungry is Shef to whack this guy?


Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


Not that I know exactly what a catcher's balk is.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted (edited)


There are like five people behind home plate doing that crazy lady's arm twirl thing.


Edited by Guest
Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


Bases jammed with Metsies.
Yes, Metsies.


Guest Swan Swan H
Guests
Posted


Sheff graciously allowing Wright to be the hero.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Surprised they're sticking wtih Calero.


Guest Swan Swan H
Guests
Posted


(sigh)

C'mon Fernando, you live for the bases loaded situation.


Posted


Anyone else think that Sheff got the ole unintentional intensional walk , looked to me like he wanted no part of him and was wanting Wright instead.


Posted


metirish wrote:
Anyone else think that Sheff got the ole unintentional intensional walk , looked to me like he wanted no part of him and was wanting Wright instead.


Yes


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I don't go for Cohen's reasoning on why to use Murphy. You want the best matchup to win there. You're not trying to get the lefty out of the game.


Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


I hate using the closer here after leaving the bases loaded.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Rodriguez ooks good, but why is in the game with Parnell only having thrown six pitches and pitcher due up next inning?


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted (edited)


Looked out to me.


Edited by Guest
Guest Swan Swan H
Guests
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Rodriguez looks good, but why is in the game with Parnell only having thrown six pitches and pitcher due up next inning?


The fear of being second-guessed for losing a game without using your closer. No logical strategic reason.


Guest Swan Swan H
Guests
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Looked out to me.


Yup. Martinez did a nice job taking the throw and getting the tag down, but Welke wouldn't buy it.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


He was out-- it's just that nobody knew it. (Sorta like the old "tree falls in the woods" bit, except if you had 7 cameras recording the unheard tree.)

Oh, and you're f*cking out, Jeremy.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


FWIW: Philly just blew their own bases-loaded, one-out situation in the 7th. (Two big differences: they're still up on Washington, 5-4, and they didn't bunt to get the one out.)


Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted (edited)


Well, here's Murphy ... no one on, one out.

(edited for dyslexia)


Edited by Guest
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


And there goes Murphy. Fartinez for the win?

(I take it this means it's Kitten time in the 10th.)


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted


Extra innings.


Guest Swan Swan H
Guests
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
And there goes Murphy. Fartinez for the win?


Turned out to be Charley Weaver for the block.


Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


All those thinking a little before 9 how nice and quick this game should be
over raise your hands.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Is that Putz' first 1-2-3 inning this year? I cannot recall another one.

Top of the order in the bottom of the 10th. LET'S GO METS!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...