Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Pelfrey optioned to AAA, Gomez up


Guest GYC

Recommended Posts

Guest GYC
Guests
Posted


http://newyork.mets.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20070513&content_id=1962150&vkey=pr_nym&fext=.jsp&c_id=nym

05/13/2007 10:57 AM ET
Mets recall Gomez, option Pelfrey


The New York Mets today recalled outfielder Carlos Gomez from New Orleans (AAA) of the Pacific Coast League and optioned righthanded pitcher Mike Pelfrey to the Zephyrs. Gomez will wear #27 and will be available for today's game vs. Milwaukee.
Gomez, 21, was hitting .286 (40-140) with 24 runs scored, eight doubles, two triples, two home runs, 13 RBI, 17 stolen bases with 15 walks and 23 strikeouts in 36 games this year with New Orleans. Gomez is leading the PCL in stolen bases.

Carlos batted .222 (2-9) with one run scored and two RBI in 10 spring training games for the Mets.

He was the co-winner of the Sterling Award, emblematic of the Most Valuable Player at Binghamton (AA) of the Eastern League in 2006. Gomez finished second in the EL with 41 stolen bases and fifth with eight triples. Carlos also batted .281 (121-430) with 53 runs scored, 24 doubles, seven home runs and 48 RBI with Binghamton.

The 6-4, 195-pounder was signed by New York as a non-drafted free agent on July 27, 2002.

Mike Pelfrey was 0-5 with a 6.53 ERA in six starts for New York. Thursday's starter against the Cubs is to be determined.


Guest OlerudOwned
Guests
Posted


Gomez. Wow.


Guest Yancy Street Gang
Guests
Posted


]Thursday's starter against the Cubs is to be determined.


Will Hernandez be ready?

Will Sele get the nod?

Or will somebody be promoted? Park? Humber?


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


Interesting news!

I suppose Go-Go helps Alou's wonkiness while we mull the decision. As I noted in Pelfrey or Die, Pelfrey needs a good deal of work at AAA.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


sucks for Pelfrey, but he earned the demotion. I'm suprised they were willing to "start the clock" on Gomez for what will likely be a short stay.

I'd have to think that if el duque isn't ready they call on Park again.... the Mets broadcasters said yesterday that Humber just isnt ready. Whether or not they could turn to Sele probably depends on whether he is needed before then (which given his role I'd hope he isn't.)


Guest OlerudOwned
Guests
Posted


One of the many (many, many) advantages of the big market money is the ability to start the clock on top prospects without having to worry about being able to afford them.


Guest Yancy Street Gang
Guests
Posted


I wonder if he starts today.

I figure the outfield will be Beltran, Green, and either Gomez or Endy.


Guest Yancy Street Gang
Guests
Posted


Lefty starter for the Brewers today, so maybe it'll be Gomez.

http://www.addamsfamily.com/addams/gomez01.jpg


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


Lineup's posted, Chavvy in left, Gomie in right


Posted


Somewhat surprising in that there's no obvious replacement for Pelfrey's next start as it sounds like at least one go 'round until El Ducky is ready.

But I guess they didn't want to send Pelfrey out there again w/o getting a AAA tune-up and they didn't want to send down position player w/Alou on the shelf for a bit ... or longer.

Green has some ugly looking numbers against Capuano so I like throwing the kid into the mess immediately.
"Starting the clock" on him is really no big deal. He was already on the 40 and if this only turns into a week or two stay then those days aren't going to make much difference in the long run. And if we're worried about not being able to send him down 3 years from now because we burned an option in May of '07 then the progress he's been making up to this point has stalled and the options thingie is the least of our worries.


Posted


Poor Lastings can't catch a break.

- gets drafted despite stories of past improprieties, then has his signing delayed due to renewed (and ulimately untrue) stories about the same incident.

- then breaks his finger in the early weeks of his first season, effectively delaying the start of his career until just about a year after the draft

- gets left off the post-season roster when he probably could have been used

- makes the team after a great Spring Training but mostly sits due to big contracts in front of him then gets sent down when those contracts get off to fast starts

- gets hurt in the minor legues just before an opening comes up top


Guest OlerudOwned
Guests
Posted


Which brings up an interesting scenario. If Gomez shows he can hold his own in the Majors at just 21 years old, and Fernando Martinez continues to impress as a 19-year old in Double-A, does Milledge finally get traded. Seriously. For real this time.


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


Going into the season, I was hopeful that Pelfrey would be able to get the job done as the fifth man in the starting rotation. Unfortunately, he just doesn't seem ready for the majors at this stage in his career. Hopefully, he can work on a few things in New Orleans to better prepare him for the future.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


I would say that after this season if the Mets aren't ready to hand Milledge a starting job in 2008 they should trade him over the offseason before his trade value further declines


Guest iramets
Guests
Posted


I notice no one has mentioned Willie's remark after Saturday's game that Pelfrey will get another start later this week.

Didn't mention that it would come in New Orleans, though, did he?

Clueless or lying? You make the call.


Posted


Neither; could be that they just changed their minds. They're allowed to do that. They wanted to see what Gomez could bring to the table, and wanted to make room for him.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


There may be two outfield spots open if Alou's option isn't picked up, so I still wouldn't assume Milledge is going anywhere. Plus somebody has to offer fair value in return, which really doesn't seem to have happened yet.

Willie's comments could have easily been made before they had a fair idea how many games Alou would miss. People do change their minds in this business, too.


Posted


iramets wrote:
I notice no one has mentioned Willie's remark after Saturday's game that Pelfrey will get another start later this week.

Didn't mention that it would come in New Orleans, though, did he?

Clueless or lying? You make the call.


Willie's a flip flopper...


Guest iramets
Guests
Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Neither; could be that they just changed their minds. They're allowed to do that. They wanted to see what Gomez could bring to the table, and wanted to make room for him.


In a few hours? If it's true, which I doubt very much , thank you, this just shows the utter uselessness of attaching any sigificance whatsoever to his pronouncements. What he actually does matters; what he says he does is a total waste of your time and his time.

"Willie, what's your feelings on Pelfrey at this point?"

"He's a piece of crap. We're sending him to AAA asap to see if he can get a clue about pitching on this level. He's totally not ready for MLB hitters, and he's outta here" and "Well, the kid had a rough day, and while you can't call it bad luck, because up here you make your own luck, he just hasn't had a lot of hitting support, and sometimes fielding support, but we think he's coming around, and we'll see how does in his next srtart on Thursday, for sure, before we make any hard and fast decisions" both mean about the same.


Guest Yancy Street Gang
Guests
Posted


I don't think there's anyone here who pays more attention to his "pronouncements" than you do.

So, why do you?


Guest vtmet
Guests
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Poor Lastings can't catch a break.

- gets drafted despite stories of past improprieties, then has his signing delayed due to renewed (and ulimately untrue) stories about the same incident.

- then breaks his finger in the early weeks of his first season, effectively delaying the start of his career until just about a year after the draft

- gets left off the post-season roster when he probably could have been used

- makes the team after a great Spring Training but mostly sits due to big contracts in front of him then gets sent down when those contracts get off to fast starts

- gets hurt in the minor legues just before an opening comes up top


Mr Milledge...if you are starting to hear some footsteps, then get used to it and start taking some grounders...CF is full, RF and LF are showing promise of being full...but 2B is wide open...


Old-Timey Member
Posted


or start hitting some homers and maybe we can find you a nice home in sunny south florida for dontrelle willis.
the young marlins are pretty set at every position going forward except CF and C.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


re: willie, yeah sal i have no idea what that was about. my best guess is that when he said it he had not spoken to minaya yet about gomez, then they got together and decided to bring gomez up and he was the obvious choice to send down.


Posted


There's also the possiblity that if Alou needs to get DL'd then Pelfrey will be re-called to take his place. The injury would negate the 10-day rule.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


very true, and certainly a possibility that the Mets thought of, if that happens I think Sal owes willie an apology. I'll apologize too since i agree with Sal even though i tried pointing out other explanations.


Guest iramets
Guests
Posted


Yancy Street Gang wrote:
I don't think there's anyone here who pays more attention to his "pronouncements" than you do.

So, why do you?


I merely mark his pronouncements because the lot of you are determined to file them away under N for "Never Said That."

Seriously, when he stuffs his foot into his mouth up the the knee, why is it of such little note? is he speaking out of turn, with no consiltation with his bosses (in which case, why ask and and why listen to what he says?) Or is he given to confident predictions of policy regarding players about which he simply changes his mind on zero notice (in which case, likewise)? I'd just like you all to get your stories straight.

In regard to FK's point, do you really think it's wise to keep throwing Pelfrey out there at this point? Would you care to take a position on whether Pelfrey's pitched well enough to stay? Or is your position simply "Whatever the Mets do, is the correct move to have been made"?


Old-Timey Member
Posted


iramets wrote:
Seriously, when he stuffs his foot into his mouth up the the knee, why is it of such little note?


1. 23-13.
2. Because it's of little consequence.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...