Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Sox Look To Move Fat Bastard


Guest Rotblatt

Sox Look To Move Fat Bastard  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Sox Look To Move Fat Bastard

    • Sign him! Take any and all of our high-ceiling youngsters. We need the post season help.
      1


Recommended Posts

Guest Rotblatt
Guests
Posted


According to Newsday.

Wells has a meh 4.98 ERA, 1.53 WHIP, 24 K, 8 BB in 47 innings this year but he seems to be turning it around.

August: 34 IP, 2.65 ERA, 1.35 WHIP, 20 K, 5 BB.

And of course, he has a history of fine post-season performances--when he bothers to show up.

Postseason: 3.15 ERA, 1.12 WHIP, 81 K, 25 BB, 120 IP

Rumor has it that he's looking to retire after his current contract is up in November, meaning this would be strictly a two-month rental. Realistically, I'd think the best the Sox could get for him would be a high-ceiling youngster, since they would need to pass through waivers. But I could be wrong.


Guest ScarletKnight41
Guests
Posted


Fat, Drunk and Stupid is no way to win a championship, Son.


Posted


Blatt, you had me going for a while.
Then I remembered that Roger Clemens is now pitching in the Lone Star (how appropriate) State and that his official (to me) nickname is "Fat Coward, bat tossing mother-fukker".
I still voted no.

Later


Posted


No thanks,and lets assume all the guys are in decent health who's spot in the post-season rotation would he take?


Guest KC
Guests
Posted


SK: >>>Fat, Drunk and Stupid is no way to win a championship<<<

That's how my softball team knocked off the NY State Police team in 1990.
Screw Wells ... and the lameassaugustfolderooin' Red Sox for that matter.


Posted


soupcan wrote:
No thank you.

If the pitching starved Red Sox don't want him then why should the Mets take him?


Well, I think the point is that they're giving up on the postseason and looking forward to next year. Still don't want him though.


Guest Rotblatt
Guests
Posted


I don't want him, but 16-1 opposed! Wow!

I'm an eternal optimist, and feel like Petey, Glavine, El Duque & Maine can take us pretty far in the post season. Having Wells around could conveivably help by, but I'd rather not thin out our farm system just so we can give Boomer three post-season starts.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Well, the one was a latecomer.

I assume "Sign him!" means "Trade for him!"

I think we have plenty of pitching, and he certainly isn't promising to be any sort of upgrade at this point.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Martinez
Glavine
Hernandez
Trachsel
Maine
Bannister
Williams
Pelfrey
Perez
Soler

That's ten more-or-less viable options, without having to invoke Jose Lima or Yusaku Iriki. I think, rather than pressure Omar Minaya to do anything, we owe him a standing O. Whether the Mets advance or not, he did his job in this department, building redundancy (and, in most cases, the right redundancy) into the rotation before the season and during the season.


Guest silverdsl
Guests
Posted


I'd go with the "hell, no!" option too. Incredibly, Wells can still sometimes come up with some good outings, but he's just as likely to suffer a reoccurance of his back/knee/gout problems too. Or say something stupid. Or do something stupid. I appreciated the ways that he helped the Yankees to win, and his Perfect Game was awesome, but he was always one of my least favorite Yankees.


Posted


this team, as edgy has pointed out, has an abundance of medioxre starting pitching. Any trade for or signing of a pitcher that isn't a clear #2 or 3 on this staff is a waste of prospects and/or money.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...