Nymr83 wrote: ="iramets"]="Frayed Knot"]="iramets"]I'd have been comfortable going into the 2007 season with a rotation of Maine and Perez and Bannister and Pelfrey and Humber You do realize that this backs are absolutely ready for prime-time 'win now' offense with 5 unproven, or barely proven, hurlers with even worse in reserve don't you? But you've got Hernandez already signed for 2007, and Pedro's going to get a bunch of starts, and I'm advocating signing Zito, if possible, and/or getting a first rank younger pitcher in a deal. Maine's earned a full shot already, I think Perez has too, and I'd give one to Bannister as well. If one of those falters, you've got Pelfrey, and if another falters you've got Humber. I believe that Glavine is expecting front-line starter money, not completely unreasonably given his w-l record last year, and will try to get at least two years on his next deal. That money could be better spent elsewhere.If we can sign him for middle (or back) of the rotation money, I'd go for that, but I don't believe that's what he's looking for. ok 1 at a time here... so what if you'v got hernandez signed? he's not very good. you can't count on Pedro getting "a bunch of starts" or on those starts being of his usual quality. yeah, Maine has earned a shot. Perez hasn't, one playoff game doesn't make you a #2 starter (as he would be with that circus of a rotation listed above) Perez should ideally be one of several candidates for 4/5. Bannister was smoke and mirrors, like Perez he's a 5th starter candidate not a guy to be relied upon. Pelfrey and Humber have shown nothing in the majors, they look like they still need time, to count on both of them along with these other guys is suicidal. now look, if you sign Zito and Glavine the rotation suddenly looks good and deep, but neither is on board yet and right now the Mets rotation looks like it belongs in Norfolk (its gonna take some time for me to get used to saying New Orleans btw) Wow Nymr. Well done. (sc = zero)