Edgy DC wrote: Edgy DC wrote: Mets � Willets Point wrote: Either way, hopefully it's a sign of better fortunes for the team. seems hard for it to be worse right? either they'll help turn things around or help them sell if they can't afford the team. Either way should lead to a team that's able to spend. Wouldn't have picked you for a grass-is-greener guy. sorry, there's always the crab grass of the ultimate buyer being a stingy, horrible owner. I hear bad things about Dolan for instance. No need to apologize. I'm not afraid of a stingy horrible owner so much as a (1) a prolonged bankruptcy period where assets have to be liquidated to cover debts, (2) a detached corporation who needs to see black ink above all else every year. Beyond that, stingy isn't a threat so much as conservative might be. Stupid as it was for the Wilpons to count on those fake profits, they sunk that money into the operations rather than paying off their principle. In this economy, I'm not sure folks will have the guts to keep reinvesting as the investments aren't paying off like the Pons did. But it's New York, and there'll likely be enough folks out there who want the vanity of pimping out the Mets in their name. Those folks will be bidding against the corporations, so we'll see. But again, the (1) and (2) above are what I fear might lies beyond the 'Pons. Not that 2014 is soon, but the Wilpons have impending debt there with Citi Field, as well as the Picard thing looming. I don't think there will be a prolonged bankruptcy period.