LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote: Just because a bill in my pocket isn't a $100K Woodrow Wilson note-- ULTRA-RARE!-- doesn't mean it has no value; whether it's $1000 or $100 or $20... it's got some worth. And just because a guy's not untouchable Wheeler or Harvey doesn't mean he's not "valuable." Relatedly, just because I could REALLY use a soda right now, that doesn't make dropping a Benjamin on a Diet Coke a good deal. If the aim is to build a sustainably successful team, you don't want to overspend wildly, in cash or (especially) in trade. Spending Valdespin (a 24-year-old, controllable multi-position asset just beginning to build his major-league value... who may end up being a LOT more than a utility guy) to get Street (a middling-to-good reliever having a very good 24-inning stretch right now, still due about $4M in salary, and NOT the one-size-fits-all-answer to getting the Mets to the postseason) would be a pretty big overspend. As-- at this point-- it's a seller's market, reliever- and righty-power-guy-wise, there is no "answer" out there that wouldn't be pretty fuggin' expensive. As such, it would be unwise to buy, at least without exhausting all internal options. (And while we know pretty well what Street is at this point-- 8-9 Ks/9 and solid, if not unhittable, relief-- we have NO idea whether he'd represent a significant performance bump over guys like Edgin/Beato, or guys like Ramirez/Francisco pitching at their previously-established performance baselines.) tl; dr-- Giving up real ML-ready value for Huston Street = dumb buy. Repeated assertion to contrary isn't more evidence; it's just kinda chafing. Alot of speculation there. I agree to disagree...They make corn starch for chafing..Your argument is at best absurd.