So that year's team copious drug use is still looked at in “no big deal” veins, including wondering if it's the ticket for current rosters to get over the hump! That's firstly assigning a consensus point of view to your own perspective. Secondly, it's speculative. Thirdly, to the extent that it is looked at as no big deal, it's a closed book from 37 years ago. I'm trying to considering what a reporter's role is when it is current information he discovers on his beat. As for "no big deal," the choices made by that team left behind a lot of human wreckage. It still does. It is, in fact it is the human wreckage of a young man's fatal fentanyl overdose that has Harvey in court in the first place. I'm not looking for Harvey's head on a platter here, but yeah, I don't know that a reporter is doing his or her job if he or she sits on that story. And as (mostly) a fan of Adam Rubin's work, I'd like the conversation to go beyond "I'll say this and stop."