I spend an inordinate amount of time thinking about the future of Jeff McNeil. I wonder if, in the near-term, he might be best suited for third base, a move that (a) opens up second for Ronny Mauricio, ( gets him out of a relationship with Francisco Lindor that may or may not be problematic, © puts him in a position that allows him to react more than think, which might ease up the grinding gears that seemingly fill his head, and (d) allows Baty and Vientos to focus on hitting from (mostly) the DH spot, and they can worry about adapting to the big leagues defensively after they've turned a corner on offense. He only played six innings there the last three seasons, but saw plenty of time there before that. A good feature from Steve Gelbs the other day spotlighted Ron Washington's role with the Braves, and how he makes a point in helping rookies through their adjustments, getting them to focus not on the alleged weak spots in their game, but on their strengths. And once they establish that their strengths play at the big league level, they can work on ironing out the rest of their game without the pressure of their MLB existence being on the line. This seemed to be both obvious and revelatory, and I'd like to see the Mets introduce rookies in a philosophically similar manner. So I'd like to see Batientos protected from defensive obligations as much as possible for the time being. Beyond that, though, I wonder if McNeil's future beyond this season may be in left field. If Mauricio is coming, and Baty and Vientos have come (if not anchored themselves in place), the soft spot in 2024 appears to be in left field, which (a) the Mets have largely vacated with the trades of Tommy Pham and and Mark Canha, and ( isn't a very good opportunity to fill from the free-agent outfield class coming in this offseason. Also © McNeil has shown himself to be a pretty good corner outfielder, lacking only the polish of a regular on stuff like carom plays. Of course, the longer-term future for McNeil may be on a different team entirely. It's hard to read how frustrated (if at all) the Mets are with his substituting a potty mouth and red ass for productivity over extended periods, or with his swinging from All-Star-level to near-replacement-level offense every other season. McNeil came up on a parallel track to Alonso, and so, even in bad years, holds a share in what the team's identity is right now. His presence may even be part of Alonso's self-identity as a big-leaguer. He's a terrific all-round ballplayer when playing right, and continually hustles when playing poorly. Left? Right? Second? Third? Gone? I just don't know. But I think on it.