I was OK with a million throws to first. It was all part of the drama. A pitcher has two opponents to worry about — the batter and the runner. He throws over a few times, gets booed by the crowd, and now he has three opponents on his mind. If he's actually worried about he runner, and is throwing over in earnest, and the runner steals anyhow, an extra psychological edge is gained by the runner. If the runner is nailed, he gets an extra psychological boost, A similar game goes down with the batter. If he's lobbing it over to stall or keep the batter guessing, and he gives up a hit to the batter, that's an extra psychological blow. If he gets the batter after that bullshit cat-and-mouse game, that's and extra boost for him, and the batter now has a bee in his bonnet. Any problems I had with the effect upon the pace of the game, it's better when the fans and the players in the dugout express that by riding the pitcher, not by instituting a rule against him. That the limit on throws over and the clock are now two new excuses for even shorter workdays for starting pitchers are more of those unintended consequences that such rules create. And the league is trying to engineer even more odd rules to combat that, instead of looking back at the situations they have created that has caused these super-short starting efforts.