Ceetar wrote: Edgy, you missed my point. I thought I responded to each one of your points. Ceetar wrote: I just mean that while I get that this is a good thing, and I'm glad that they did it, I don't get exciting for 'possibilities'. You seem to be complaining about it, and speculating about better options that Alderson passed on, and lamenting the loss and the lack of birds in hand. Ceetar wrote: I don't want to root for anyone to get traded... Me. Ceetar wrote: or celebrate it Me. Ceetar wrote: even Frankie. Even Hebner! Ceetar wrote: 99.9% of my enjoyment comes from the actual team on the field Seriously, is this me posting? Ceetar wrote: which is worse now, even if slightly. That's debatable, but I get your point. But it would be arguably worse if anybody is traded with nobody immediately added to the team. GMs have to step back and make reasonable choices about the present and the future. We all understand this, no? Ceetar wrote: I know that there is now a somewhat higher percentage that my enjoyment will be heightened sometime in the future, but that doesn't mean I'm going to look at the trade today and feel good about it. That's just now how I enjoy baseball. Me neither. But that's the emotional argument. You're actually all over arguing not the immediate emotional downside, but the rational one. And it's not there. Look, I want trading a player without his permission to be outlawed. But that doesn't mean that, in a world where trading does exist, this is a bad one. Hey, maybe Jose Reyes is signed by this time tomorrow. The Mets owners started this season in an existential crisis. That they've been able to stay out of the offseason market, survive critical injuries, put a .500 team (or better?) on the field, shed crucial contracts, improved at the minor league level, barely retained control of the team, and put themselves back in the position where re-signing both Reyes and Wright is within the realm of reasonable hope? Minor fucking miracle. So far.