Been thinking about "Casey at the Bat" today during my evening shower, after posting about it in the IGT. Score is 4-2, with the home team up in the bottom of the ninth. They have runners on second and third with two out, the runner on second being the tying run. Casey, according to the tone of the poem, is the only batter anyone respects in the lineup. We never learn the on-deck hitter's name. You don't want to put the winning run on, but the book says to play for the win on the road, and Casey sure seems more dangerous at the plate than on first. Nothing in the poem suggests who is on deck, suggesting he's far below the level of Casey's ability. On the other hand, you just gave up a single to a pudding and a double to a fake. We all know the big guy whiffs, but based on what we knew up until he stepped in, do you agree with the visiting team's strategy? Seems to me three managers in four pitch around him, and then walk him if they fall behind 2-0. The poem came out in 1888 --- a low-scoring era in which the National League OpS'd at a Reyesque .609.