* The danger, of course, is that he was putting the winning run on when he walked Buck and "The Book" considers that a no-no. That's a pretty good page in the book. On the other hand he did it to get to a pitcher batting (no NYM options) who, if he swung away, was a GiDP candidate or, if he bunted, the 2nd out. Well, sure, but if he doesn't, he gets a chance to pitch to Buck for the second out --- and every manager in the league knows Buck is pitchable these days, chasing outside slider after outside slider for six weeks --- and Harvey for the third out, taking the bunting option away from the pitcher. Walking Buck sets up the Bunt, Terry gets a pass out of the corner he had painted himself into. * IW-ing Q to get to Brown is a little more suspect in that it brought the game-tying walk into play. But it also gave Collmenter a RHB to face instead of a LHB, a newbie instead of a vet, and worked around the night's hot batter for one recently in the game. And it's not so much the game-tying walk, but it's the pitch you throw to avoid the game-tying walk. Brown is just the sort of AAA star that is dangerous in the bigs --- if you have to go after him and if you have your back end-pitchers at him. Q was hot, no doubt, but pitch around him a little. Give you pitcher a chance to get him out without giving into him. Don't just quit on him. Basically, it came down to --- do I want to pitch to Buck with a chance to tie the game with a single, or force them to execute a bunt successfully giving Quintanilla with a chance to win the game with a single? Buck-for-a-single vs. Harvey-for-a-sacrifice-and-Quintanilla-for-a-single, with a bigger payoff. I take curtain #2 every time. It can probably be quantifiably measured with some reliability.