Ceetar wrote: TransMonk wrote: "If I had done this intentionally or unintentionally, I'd be the first one to step up and say, 'I did it'." "I truly believe in my heart, and I would bet my life that this substance never entered my body at any point." It's fine if players want to argue their case within the rules that apply to the crime...but they shouldn't then say shit like this that is blatently not true. That's all I'm saying. He got off on a technicality the first time, but that's not the same as being innocent. He proclaimed innocence before he got off on that technicality. Everyone claims they're innocent when they're not. I mean, the only other option was to go full-on "no comment" and it's not like that really would've been received differently. This is plainly untrue. There are, again, plenty of players that, once they failed a test, copped to their use, came clean, apologized, and took their punishment. I'm unsure why you would asset this. Braun didn't do this. He, in fact, bet his life, among other ridiculous and nasty and damaging things. This means not only does Trans Monk get to ridicule him, he can actually legally take Braun's life if he is of a mind to.