Vic Sage wrote: FK, it's interesting (at least to me) that we had the same idea about who to include (with us having identical lists) but different philosophies about how to rank them (at least toward the bottom). We both weighed ABs/IP/G appearances as criteria for inclusion, but once having included a player, i chose to list those who made a net positive contribution in more limited opportunities over players who had a net negative impact in many more opportunities. IOW, once I decided a player should be included on the list of 30, their greater (-) WAR weighed even more heavily against them the more they played. Hadn't realized that we had the same list. I make it a point not to look at other lists until I complete my own. That whole quantity-vs-quality thing has long been the biggest question mark in this project and the one subject to the greatest range of interpretation. I've generally tended to side over the years with the idea that, while it would be nice if the short-term success story had been given more opportunities to shine, the fact is he wasn't and so his contributions were limited. On the flip side, the idea that a replacement type of player being an upgrade on struggling regular is more one on which to judge a GM or a long term strategy of building a team than it is for this project. That Diaz & Familia weren't good in 2019 (and certainly not as good as hoped but we're not supposed to be grading on a curve here) isn't in question. But just their everyday-ness means they also had more than a few good outings as well, something that a September call-up would have trouble matching in only a dozen or so innings. I'm going to review my list before ending this thing next week -- **closing next Wednesday night for anyone who wants to add and change** -- and may change of few things, particularly on those where I differ widely from the general consensus. Or a I may not change anything at all, but I'm open to considering. As things stand now: SEAWOLF is low on Vargas & Panik compared to the consensus, higher than the rest on Familia, Lagares VIC SAGE is low on Diaz, high on Wilson & Nido GWRECK is low on Diaz (no score at all) while having Font higher than most EDGY is low on Avilan (with or w/o the accent) while high on several short-termers: Mazza, Rivera, Santiago CEETAR also left Avilan pointless in favor of the likes of Pounders, Mazza, Rivera GFaFiF likes Brach less than most but R. Davis more so FK is low on both Brach & Guillorme, high on Wilson, Lagares & Familia If anyone does change their list in any way before next week, put those changes into a new list; I won't necessarily see those changes if you just edit the old one.