A quick list of FAQs for newbies concerning the player status levels next to your posts and about this whole Rankings Forum in general:(updated 3/15/17)Why does it say 'Jim the Monstrously Huge Batboy' next to my post?* Because that's the 'status level' that all newbies getHow long will I have it?* Stick around and find outBut everyone else has a real player!* But everyone else has a real player ... oh quit whiningSo just who was 'Jim the Monstrously Huge Batboy'?* Back sometime in the mid/late '90s there was a Met batboy with the name 'Jim' on the back of his uniform who, even though he looked to be only around 14-15 years old, was at least the size of Dallas GreenSo I get assigned a different Met player after a set number of posts?* That's the ideaAre all Mets included?* No. More than half of the over 1,000 Mets were deemed to have contributions to the team so insignificant that they didn't even make the cut.How many levels are there?* 500How many posts between levels?* It gets steeper as you go. Attaining quality is never easy young Grasshopper.So the players get better as my post level increases?* Yes, at least theoreticallyHow was the order decided?* Well, that's a bit of a long story:A discussion after the 2001 season about which players contributed the most and/or least to that season led to a challenge to do the same to all 40 seasons. So, after much discussion, arguing, name-calling and hair-pulling, each season had 30 players ranked as to their contribution. Points were assigned for each rank and then multiplied by the weighted success of the team that season. The results were added up and a score was reached so that the best and longest lasting Mets garnered the total most points and therefore best overall rank. (OK, so it wasn't so long afterall)Who was #1?* Still 'The Franchise' but that might not hold out forever.Can I see the list?* Yes, but then we'd have to kill you.Actually, go to the end of this thread for the most recent version of the list. Two lists actually, one displayed in alphabetical order, the other in numeric order.The list gets updated each year and we're sometimes even up to date on the updates.If I hate the player I'm assigned can I do anything about it?* Well you can get mad, leave in a huff and never comeback. Or you could continue to put up more (hopefully intelligent) posts until you're someone else.You mean at some point I'll be Vince Coleman?!?!* 'Fraid soReally?* Yes, really!.What if I think someone is ranked too high or too low?* Well, if you're really a masochist you can dig through the thread for each year that said player played, see what the final result was and then argue that he should have been higher or lower in those yearsWill anyone listen?* If you make a decent argument they might. Depending on your angle the reactions could vary anywhere from;"Excellent point young lad, we never thought about it that way!"to "If you think we're rehashing this crap again you got another think coming!"... or anywhere in between depending on the quality of your argument and the mood and/or sobriety of the person who reads it.Is the list up to date?* Yup! (c). All results from the 2016 season are now included so the list is set until we need to consider 2017.When it's time to analyze 2017 can I join in the discussion?* Sure