and the cry goes out for a seperate thread ]Yet, Steve Zabriskie got heat for NOT saying something memorable at the moment that the Mets clinched the NL East in 1986. Wasn't the problem that he mis-called something, or failed to properly say what was won? Doesn't really matter to me either way. I too was unaware of any "problem" at the time and it hardly ruins my memory of the moment now that I know in retrospect that it was imperfect. ]You'd be surprised (perhaps) at how many people pay close attention to these so-called signature moments No, I'm pretty aware of it, and I suspect part of it is because fans have been trained to expect it and the announcers, in turn, expect us to expect it. I also suspect many of them are doing it to impress and one-up their peers in the same way that White House correspondants ask 30-second long convoluted questions as press conferences; for the reflected insider glory. A lot of this, in my mind, got its start back to when Al Michaels' vaulted to national prominence by asking the country; 'Do you believe in miracles?'. The difference there was, after allowing the final 2 seconds to tick off and then answering his own question with an emphatic "Yes", he shut the fuck up and allowed us to watch the result without interruption. I'm not sure his modern-day equivelent would do the same because he's thinking about his call not just for those watching at that moment but for the future and the ones who'll see the replays on ESPN who will forever have the benefit of his golden tones telling those watching athletes celebrating that they were watching athletes celebrating.