Nymr83 wrote: It depends. If the guy was resisting in some way - other than just being a stupid drunk who is having fun until he's caught and goes quietly - then it's one thing. But tasers occasionally kill people and I prefer cops/security folks didn't pick that as their first option based on the premise that he might do something or because it's easier than chasing him. what would you consider "goes quietly"? remember that clown who slugged a coach? (i think a white sox game?) Not that certainly. That guy - a father/son team of drunks actually - went from the stands directly at the coach with obvious menace in mind. running away from the authorities is enough for me, you don't belong on the field and you know it. security/police should not have to give you the benefit of the doubt when you are already trespassing and risk the safety of the teams' personnel or their own safety. plus, he's a phillies fan, so taze his ass. It's a judgement call as it usually is with good law enforcement. In this particular case you have a skinny teenager running aimlessly in circles while waving a towel with no attempt or even hint that he was going after a player. In cases like that I'd prefer that going to the taser not be the first option nor be the choice based on not wanting to spend another 15 seconds cornering the guy.