In particular, the McReynolds/Mitchell trade - which has been entered as evidence of one of the destructive or at least meddling acts of the newly empowered Sir Fred of Wilponia - wasn't anything of the sort. Joe McIlvane, long-time ML scout, head NYM scout since 1981, and asst GM by 1985, told the story more than once about how he LOVED Kevin McReynolds, thought he was the best amateur player he ever scouted (JMc joined the Mets right after Strawberry did) was sorry he never got the chance to draft him and wasn't about to miss out on a chance to trade for him if available. So with him in the #2 chair of player personnel decisions and Cashen not only still ensconced as #1 but also having all the power of a WS-winning GM who turned the club around inside 5 years to the most dominant team the NL has seen since the Big Red Machine of the mid-'70s and hasn't seen since, does anyone really think that the reason this trade was made was strictly because Fred was fraidy-scared of having Kevin Mitchell in the locker room? btw, that trade was almost universally lauded at the time (a case of the rich getting richer was the main take) and, while I know McReynolds has his detractors among NYM fans, I liked the deal then and still like it now. The larger point being that if this is what's being used to show that Wilpon's more hands-on approach was the key to the downfall of the mid-'80s dominance I think it's being done by those who are starting with their conclusion and then attempting to retro-fit whatever evidence they find into their "proof".